Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Johnson and Dan Akroyd?


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

So you weren't trying to insinuate that it made a difference, you just felt like pointing out the brand for no apparent reason?

i was pointing out the brand because someone stated it was ghetto to be under dressed in certain places. just stating his sweatsuit was polo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can think of 72 million reason$ he should respect his organization and not wear your employers biggest rival's appeal.

Its like Steve Jobs (RIP) wearing a Microsoft Hoodie...

Well since Microsoft bailed Apple out when they were about to go bankrupt I could see Jobs wearing a Microsoft Hoodie. Try again son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that makes it not under dressed, or "ghetto"?

Yes you could go to Morton's or Ruth's Chris wearing a sweatsuit as long as it's a name brand sweatsuit and not one from Target.:rolleyes: You are underdressed in any sweatsuit whether it's Polo, Burberry, or Armani it doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you could go to Morton's or Ruth's Chris wearing a sweatsuit as long as it's a name brand sweatsuit and not one from Target.:rolleyes: You are underdressed in any sweatsuit whether it's Polo, Burberry, or Armani it doesn't matter.

CJ got fug you money.....when you got that, you can roll any way you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

under dressed.calling something against the norm ghetto is ignorant and i was responding to that. thats why i started another paragraph before saying his sweatsuit was polo.

Ignorant is thinking that a 'polo' sweatsuit constitutes as a suit. If he wasn't a rich athlete, they would have laughed at him when he tried to get in.

I see a lot of people get turned away from places downtown for dressing like that and they get mad or claim 'racism' ...lol that's pretty ignorant too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The brand doesn't make an outfit less appropriate for a venue just because it's more expensive. If you're supposed to be dressed up I don't care if you're wearing a $200 designer t-shirt youre still dressed innapropriatly. But I don't think he was dressed crazy for where he was at. I don't like wearing sweatpants out unless I'm just running to the store real quick but I know some people do. And I also have been out in the epicenter and seen people dressed a lot nicer than CJ get turned away from Mez...but CJ would probebly spend those people's entire bill on his first round so I can't hate Mez for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ignorant is thinking that a 'polo' sweatsuit constitutes as a suit. If he wasn't a rich athlete, they would have laughed at him when he tried to get in.

I see a lot of people get turned away from places downtown for dressing like that and they get mad or claim 'racism' ...lol that's pretty ignorant too

I will say the place in the epicenter are more equally f*ck you than other places in Charlotte. Mez will turn whites and blacks away like its nothing...but they've got the hottest bartenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...