Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thunder Run: The movie


Gazi

Recommended Posts

Imagine being part of the most badass armored strike on Baghdad during OIF. Despite it being the biggest day of your military career it was also the one you'd love to forget as a human being.

And just when you're all cozy at home, drinking a beer and rolling a fattie you stumble upon this piece of news.

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni17297816/

Freedom Films CEO Brian Presley announced today that macho men Gerard Butler, Avatar star Sam Worthington and Matthew McConaughey signed on to play the lead soldiers in his state-of-the-art adaptation of David Zucchino’s Iraq War novel Thunder Run – The Armored Strike to Capture Baghdad. Variety reported that Expendables 2 director Simon West already signed on to helm the movie using the latest 3-D technology as well as motion capture effects in order to show the capture of Baghdad in 2003.

3D. Are you fuging kidding me?! You know you want to see it but you might just start going apeshit at those teenagers around you once that 3D action hits and you relive that poo again.

Plus, everyone will now associate that event with those douchebags Butler and McConaughey. For life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally, I read that book when it first came out and loved it. It looks like their going to screw it up though and turn it into a blockbuster action flick aimed at highschool teens. IMO it's very disrespectful to both the American and Iraqi dead to do this film in any other fashion than gritty & realistic.

Want to be blown away? Go read the book, then find the video of the thunder run that someone recorded with a camera mounted on their M1. Scary to see what you read about occurring in real time.

Now they just need to make a Moon is a Harsh Mistress movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...