Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: LaFell to move to #2 WR spot vs. Colts


holycrikey

Recommended Posts

I'm pretty sure Cam knows the system by now, plus he has DA who also knows the EXACT playbook. What Naanee ran in SD was similar to what we run here but it's not EXACT.

DA isn't in the huddle, he also doesn't play receiver. I was talking about on the field influence. What I said has been stated by the coaching staff on more than one occasion. It doesn't matter though, LaFell is getting his shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Cam knows the system by now, plus he has DA who also knows the EXACT playbook. What Naanee ran in SD was similar to what we run here but it's not EXACT.

so DA know the exact playbook, but naanee doesn't. Do you ever listen to yourself?

The playbook is far from exactly what DA ran many years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we run enough to the outside for a wr's blocking abilities to be the the most important factor in deciding who starts? I understood the importance under Fox, but now (while it is a factor) it shouldn't be as important as a receiver's ability to make plays in the passing game.

thats what i was trying to stress before the olsen fan boy decided to intervene and act like he knows anything

i fuggin hate mr know-it-alls

he likes naanee for his blocking, so i dont understand why keeps him out there more for his blocking skills

Am I getting trolled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, can we agree that LaFell is the better pure receiver? He is also a very good deep threat, but not elite speed. Nanee does have experience with the system & Rivera has referenced that, which leads many of us to believe that was a primary factor for him starting over LaFell. We have to also remember that Nanee is Rivera's guy & LaFell is not; that shouldn't matter, but it does to many coaches. LaFell is no slouch in the blocking game, since that's a big reason Fox/Hurney went with him over other faster more pure receiving guys in the draft (I don't have a reference for that, but that was a noted strength of LaFell coming out & Foxy used WRs to block more than receive.

I think Rivera has made a mistake by keeping Nanee in for so long, but it was smart at the beginning of the season (assuming LaFell could not pick up the blocking schemes & routes early on).

Just FYI, per football outsiders, the 'Catch Rates' of our top 3 WRs go as follows:

1) 68% success: B. LaFell

2) 62% success: S. Smith

3) 56% success: L. Nanee

LaFell should at a minimum get the shot to replace Nanee; I guess getting your chance due to injury is still a chance tho!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I getting trolled?

Seems like it. :toetap05:

I have no dog in that fight, but it's too bad, b/c this is a fun discussion. The personal attacks seem childish, no matter who does them & is better suited for the Aints fans or some other losers. :smilewinkgrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I don't think we can find one person here that would advocate naanee ahead of lafell. They would have to be literally brain dead.

It's funny though how highly touted gettis is like he's hall of fame worthy and he's already our #2 wr from the IR list. I believe lafell could end up the better of the two and I hope he lights it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do wonder if some of you actually watch the games or only get your info from the internet. Naanee is consistently the best inside blocker on the WR corps. In fact, he is almost exclusively the only WR asked to block on the inside like a TE normally does. I wish Lafell would have been starting over him since day 1 since this was obviously a lost year. But Lafell hasn't even been asked to block as a WR on a consistent basis so some quote from John Fox 2 years ago means absolute crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do wonder if some of you actually watch the games or only get your info from the internet. Naanee is consistently the best inside blocker on the WR corps. In fact, he is almost exclusively the only WR asked to block on the inside like a TE normally does. I wish Lafell would have been starting over him since day 1 since this was obviously a lost year. But Lafell hasn't even been asked to block as a WR on a consistent basis so some quote from John Fox 2 years ago means absolute crap.

Maybe you don't watch college football, so I'll just chalk it up to that. You think I mentioned LaFell's blocking 'skills' d/t a quote from John Fox? :confused: You misread.

I watched the majority of his LSU games & researched him coming out. Draftniks, etc. also spoke about his blocking skills. It was clear the blcoking phase of the game was important for WRs according to Fox, b/c pointed out the importance of that phase of the game for WRs on multiple occasions. I had a feeling back then we would draft him d/t his blocking, since Fox was our coach. I didn't say he was a good blocker b/c Fox said so.

Nanee has been 'asked' to block inside, but that's b/c that is how Rivera/Chud decided to use him (probably b/c he is does not have good hands). A top Wr can takle DBS out of the game by running a decoy route, which Nanee cannot do, b/c he doesn't have the other teams respect as a WR. He 'has' to be able to block to be of use in the rushing game.

Talking out of your rear b/c you don't understand something is what is truely "absolute crap". :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the bigger news here is that Edwards will get time at third receiver. It will be pretty interesting to see what he does with the chance.

And fwiw, I can't really comment on Nanee's blocking, but Lafell is outstanding in that phase of the game. Has been since his early college days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...