Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David DeCastro


wesley17

Recommended Posts

I think this guy is our pick if we can't land Claiborne or if Kirkpatrick is gone or better suited to play safety. DeCastro could start right away. The way rivera talked about how otah has been doing well working out everyday and he's in a contract year next year, I think otah will play up to his potential next year. With DeCastro we will have the best offensive line in the league.

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=82440&draftyear=2013&genpos=OG

http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_19405067

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this guy is our pick if we can't land Claiborne or if Kirkpatrick is gone or better suited to play safety. DeCastro could start right away. The way rivera talked about how otah has been doing well working out everyday and he's in a contract year next year, I think otah will play up to his potential next year. With DeCastro we will have the best offensive line in the league.

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=82440&draftyear=2013&genpos=OG

http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_19405067

I could see this happening if things go the way you've stated. However, I think he would replace Wharton at LG if we went this route. Bell or Schwartz will battle it out for the RG spot in TC. Wharton may have to have his contract re-worked or be cut, unfortunately. No proof of this, but with our current cap situation, DeCastro could be an less costly alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeCastro is a beast. I mentioned him in a post the other night. I really think the chances we take him are much higher than some might think...particularly at the spot we're picking (which might be no man's land for defensive players if Kirkpatrick is gone). He's been mauling people all year, and I have seen more than one favorable comparison to Steve Hutchinson. So even though Guards rarely get taken in the first round, especially the top half, DeCastro looks to be the rare exception that is worthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see this happening if things go the way you've stated. However, I think he would replace Wharton at LG if we went this route. Bell or Schwartz will battle it out for the RG spot in TC. Wharton may have to have his contract re-worked or be cut, unfortunately. No proof of this, but with our current cap situation, DeCastro could be an less costly alternative.

I might be one of few who thinks wharton has played well but too much money, Schwartz showed alot of promise and if Wharton is cut will take alot ps stress off the cap for a defensive player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A guard? With a top 10 pick? A guard?

Seriously, a guard?

Ask NO how important dominating Guards can be. Ask Seattle when Hutchinson was in his prime. No, it's not a normal place to take one, but DeCastro is a rare Guard and when you have the chance to take a rare talent like him, you take it...with the caveat that you do so only as long as it's not at the expense of filling a more dire need position with a player that would also be good value at that spot.

With that said, he most likely will only be a consideration if there isn't a defensive player worthy of the pick. And right now, the only defensive player that looks to fit in that range and would be good value or have anything close to similar impact is Kirkpatrick, and maybe Couples if the team feels he can be a dominant DT (even though I don't think DT is as high on their need list as it is for many fans). CB and LB are the biggest needs right now (FA could change that), and other than Claiborne and Kirkpatrick, there isn't a CB that has any business going that high, and I don't see any LB's worthy of a top 15 pick either. So going BPA (particularly at a position that can be upgraded) becomes more of a likelihood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm liking the idea of this pick more and more. RG was a concern during the offseason coming in, and it was addressed with some spit and elbow grease. He could come in and start from day one.

I think Brandon Hogan is expected to be the #2 next year with Butler in the nickel, Captain and Stanford working special teams and depth. Then again, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the cornerback position got a complete overhaul outside of Gamble. I think Cap stays for his contribution on special teams (which I think might be a reason that Vaughn could make the team over Goodson next season).

This is the worst part about being a fan. The waiting is going to drive me insane :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...