Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade down?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Jack (I think) made a point in another thread: Trading down is not that easy. You have to find someone willing to trade up.

He is right. If we are NOT going to draft one of the top 3 OTs in the draft, there are a ton of teams looking for one as a primary need. So, if at least Reiff or Martin is on the board (and at least one should be), who are the teams that might want to trade up? These are the teams needing tackles (from memory) Kansas City, Arizona, Baltimore, Buffalo, Minnesota, St. Louis, Indy, Miami, and probably about 3 more. Not that we would trade with all of these, but teams would have to leapfrog teams that need T. So, if there is a T and we announce we want to drop, we WILL get offers if a LT is on the board.

So, what would you do? Stick and take a T for ourselves or Kirkpatrick, Trade, but how far down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the needs the panthers have on the defensive side on the ball they need to recoup the 3rd round pick they used to get Olsen. A trade down is in order. I am a new Panther fan and cant believe how much cap money is tied up with unworthy players. There is no flexibility to do anything in free agency. Hopefully, some of the guys who were hurt and not playing will be back to full strength next season. A stud receiver to go with Smith is a must. Also the team needs to pass more from play action with the great RB production it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Reiff or Martin are available for us, I could definitely see us taking one of them. But if we decide to trade down I could see the Bills (if we pick ahead of Miami), Chiefs or Cardinals sending us a 3rd (or maybe even next year's 2nd) to leapfrog the Bills to get one of them. A 3rd would be sufficient to move down 2 or 3 spots in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worry that Zach Brown might not be an instant starter and that he might be a physical specimen, but lack the football skills needed. Tackling, filling gaps, etc.

Since we don't have a third rounder, I would hope the guys we do get to pick could contribute sooner than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been against drafting dline help, but after watching the giants yesterday. If we do trade down im all for using whatever our top two picks end up being on dline. The giants corners are nothing great and they shut down atlanta because the pressure their line puts on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...