Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BCS NCG: Bama vs LSU


HeatCheck

Recommended Posts

Are any of you actual Bama or Tiger fans, or just redneck SEC fanbois?

You spend all year hating these two teams but now defend them when the game is underwhelming just because of the conference.

But but but...how can they support these teams if they aren't fans..?! Not when the game is bad, and it's bad all right, because teams aren't throwing for 4 and 5 touchdowns, which is the TRUE mark of a good football team!

You see like how much of a simpleton you sound?

GOOd GAmE=Lotz OF POInTS BECuZ I NEEd 2 be Exciteed!!

Some of us enjoy good football, chess matches. We enjoy seeing teams try to out maneuver each other. Some of us actually understand the game as a whole, and aren't just a bunch of fantasy football toolbags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm acting like someone pissed in my cornflakes because I say a re-match that's playing out exactly like the game tht we've already seen is boring? That's not acting like someone pissed in my cornflakes' date=' that's calling a spade a spade....[/quote']

Ah I see. You'd rather be "excited" than have the two best teams play for the championship. Alright.

As long as we're clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said that. You're just putting words in my mouth now. Another good indicator of a weak argument. SoCal has had some pretty good teams. However, one game against a quality opponent cannot measure that.

One game against a quality opponent does not make a good team. Just look at Boise State.

Actually you did....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But but but...how can they support these teams if they aren't fans..?! Not when the game is bad, and it's bad all right, because teams aren't throwing for 4 and 5 touchdowns, which is the TRUE mark of a good football team!

You see like how much of a simpleton you sound?

GOOd GAmE=Lotz OF POInTS BECuZ I NEEd 2 be Exciteed!!

Some of us enjoy good football, chess matches. We enjoy seeing teams try to out maneuver each other. Some of us actually understand the game as a whole, and aren't just a bunch of fantasy football toolbags.

Here's the thing. This isn't good football, LSU is playing like poo in all aspects and Bama should be running away with this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Golden Calf of Bristol a good college QB? I think you are confusing athlete with QB. Florida's defense was a beast that year holding OU, one of the best offenses in CFB history to 14 points. If you would have deferred to the QB position that year it would have been Bradford.

Chris Leak was inconsistent and very frustrating to watch. In the championship game he was good but as a whole very frustrating.

When I say good college QB I am not talking as a pure passer... for the system he ran in college he was very good, put up nasty numbers, and scored multiple td's and made plays. You can be a option QB and be a good college QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the thing. This isn't good football, LSU is playing like poo in all aspects and Bama should be running away with this one.

Both of these teams have better defenses than we've seen in college football in some time. They aren't going to allow offenses to score three and four touchdowns. Alabama's special teams play has given them the advantage in this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the thing. This isn't good football, LSU is playing like poo in all aspects and Bama should be running away with this one.

Sigh. This gets really annoying having to explain over and over. Just because teams aren't completing 85% of their passes and scoring every 5 plays does not mean that they are bad. In this case it is because there is a darn good defense on the other side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah I see. You'd rather be "excited" than have the two best teams play for the championship. Alright.

As long as we're clear.

LSU was clearly the best team in the regular season, there's absolutely no way to know that OSU wouldn't have beaten Bama because the game didn't happen. Your assumption that Alabama is better then OSU because of the eyeball test is SEC homerism at best....would Alabama be the favored team, absolutely, but OSU would give them a fight because of their explosive offense and consistent QB play....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh. This gets really annoying having to explain over and over. Just because teams aren't completing 85% of their passes and scoring every 5 plays does not mean that they are bad. In this case it is because there is a darn good defense on the other side.

Just because you make that assumption, doesn't mean it to be true.....this gets really annoying having to reiterate again and again....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LSU was clearly the best team in the regular season' date=' there's absolutely no way to know that OSU wouldn't have beaten Bama because the game didn't happen. Your assumption that Alabama is better then OSU because of the eyeball test is SEC homerism at best....would Alabama be the favored team, absolutely, but OSU would give them a fight because of their explosive offense and consistent QB play....[/quote']

It isn't me whose saying it. It's the experts who receive money to do this job at the highest level. The only argument you have is some ridiculous tin foil hat theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh. This gets really annoying having to explain over and over. Just because teams aren't completing 85% of their passes and scoring every 5 plays does not mean that they are bad. In this case it is because there is a darn good defense on the other side.

I don't expect an 85% completion percentage. I do however expect the number one team in the country to move the ball. The false starts, the bad snaps, dropped passes are not go D that's bad offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...