Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

10 Most hated companies in the US


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

So basically the more people that use your service, the more people there are to bitch about something, the more people hate you.

Everybody uses Facebook, people hate Facebook.

Everybody banks with BofA, everybody hates BofA.

Everybody has AT&T, everybody hates AT&T.

So the goal in business seems to get so big that everybody needs you and then you can completely disregard customer service because people will just piss and moan and use you anyway. GO AMERICA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically the more people that use your service, the more people there are to bitch about something, the more people hate you.

Everybody uses Facebook, people hate Facebook.

Everybody banks with BofA, everybody hates BofA.

Everybody has AT&T, everybody hates AT&T.

So the goal in business seems to get so big that everybody needs you and then you can completely disregard customer service because people will just piss and moan and use you anyway. GO AMERICA!

BOA everyone hates banks right now, Facebook been making alot of changes. Netflix changed pricing on people and lost alot of customers.

I havent shopped at Sears for over 17 years. Long story short they wouldnt approve me for a credit card when I was just starting a job and need tools to do it. So they lost my business for life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sear's didn't refuse you credit, CitiBank did. Sears doesn't issue their own credit cards. It may have their name on it, but they are not the ones extending you a credit line. Sears also offers credit through HSBC for people with worse credit scores.

That's the same thing as if you were to order an item online and it gets crushed by UPS, but instead of blaming UPS, you stop buying from the company you bought the item from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd sign back up for netflix if their online streaming options were better. I don't really care to get anything in the mail.

The movies are kinda lackluster but the tv shows on instant can't be beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sear's didn't refuse you credit, CitiBank did. Sears doesn't issue their own credit cards. It may have their name on it, but they are not the ones extending you a credit line. Sears also offers credit through HSBC for people with worse credit scores.

That's the same thing as if you were to order an item online and it gets crushed by UPS, but instead of blaming UPS, you stop buying from the company you bought the item from.

I didnt have a credit score back then and that wasnt a option. Still wont shop with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...