Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SportsCenter Special Tuesday Night at 9pm (Cam Interview)


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

I wonder when will ESPN stop asking Cam about that bogus pay-for-play scandal that they pushed in order to hurt Auburn? They are so darn predictable.

They ignore all the real life scandal but sit and endlessly spin fake ones that more suit their agenda and isn't harming anyone of important in their eyes.

I wonder how aware would we have been at what was going on at PSU had ESPN reported that there was a sexual charge against Sandusky by the DA in 1998. U knew it had to make at least the local news because Jerry was/is prominent man in that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder when will ESPN stop asking Cam about that bogus pay-for-play scandal that they pushed in order to hurt Auburn? They are so darn predictable.

They ignore all the real life scandal but sit and endlessly spin fake ones that more suit their agenda and isn't harming anyone of important in their eyes.

I wonder how aware would we have been at what was going on at PSU had ESPN reported that there was a sexual charge against Sandusky by the DA in 1998. U knew it had to make at least the local news because Jerry was a prominent man in that area.

Although money never changed hands, Cam's father did pitch him to Mississippi State. That is a fact he has acknowledged and does not deny. So, while the core allegations were baloney, the initial feelers were sent out, and while I'm certain Cam had no clue about it, it still had to be tough to have so much scrutiny brought on because of some very real mistakes his father made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dammit..missed Cam, Aaron Rodgers was awesome though, such a chill, chill dude. Personally I'm glad the future of the NFL is comprised of these guys (Cam, Rodgers, etc..) interesting and funny...unlike the stock, stilted and boring Peyton Manning, Tom Brady archetypes we've had at the QB position.

If you think Peyton Manning and Tom brady are boring football players you must not know anything about football. two of the greatest of all time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although money never changed hands, Cam's father did pitch him to Mississippi State. That is a fact he has acknowledged and does not deny. So, while the core allegations were baloney, the initial feelers were sent out, and while I'm certain Cam had no clue about it, it still had to be tough to have so much scrutiny brought on because of some very real mistakes his father made.

Actually, Cam's father didn't have to "pitch" Cam to MSU. His father knew the sports coordinator, Dan Mullen (?), because was under Meyer while Cam was at UF. As a matter of fact, the agent stated that it was Cam's father who introduced him to Dan Mullen and the other coaches at a football game one night. He claimed he didn't know them before.

Why would a father who already had more inside connect with a school, turn to an outside agent who didn't have any real connection with the school except attending it, and ask him to hustle money for his kid to attend the school? Makes no sense. And, Auburn recruited Cam straight out of Blinn, so there was no need for an agent to go to Auburn.

IMO, this was nothing more than bitter school rivarly that got out of hand. I don't even follow college football and I was suspicious of the accusations as soon as I read some of the stories online.

ESPN thought they had real time Reggie Bush like scandal on their hands involving Auburn. When they realize they really didn't, instead of letting the story die, they realized that they had an audience who wanted to keep the story going regardless of it's truthfullness. And we all know ESPN does not shy away from pushing lies to generate an audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think Peyton Manning and Tom brady are boring football players you must not know anything about football. two of the greatest of all time

Pretty sure he was talking about their personalities not their play. Manning/Brady on the field = enthralling; in interviews and off the cuff stuff = paint dryingly boring.

Although with Brady, I think it has more to do with his coach than his actual personality. I mean he's gotta have, at least, a decent personality to land Gisele right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure he was talking about their personalities not their play. Manning/Brady on the field = enthralling; in interviews and off the cuff stuff = paint dryingly boring.

Although with Brady, I think it has more to do with his coach than his actual personality. I mean he's gotta have, at least, a decent personality to land Gisele right?

Also, I bellieve guys like Peyton and Brady are very leary of the media. They give very generic or empty answers that cannot be spinned into some long drawn out story. Case in point, Peyton and his neck.

I watched Brady's SB interview today and although he was a bit boring. You can tell when he's not a mike, he's quite a character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Cam's father didn't have to "pitch" Cam to MSU. His father knew the sports coordinator, Dan Mullen (?), because was under Meyer while Cam was at UF. As a matter of fact, the agent stated that it was Cam's father who introduced him to Dan Mullen and the other coaches at a football game one night. He claimed he didn't know them before.

Why would a father who already had more inside connect with a school, turn to an outside agent who didn't have any real connection with the school except attending it, and ask him to hustle money for his kid to attend the school? Makes no sense. And, Auburn recruited Cam straight out of Blinn, so there was no need for an agent to go to Auburn.

IMO, this was nothing more than bitter school rivarly that got out of hand. I don't even follow college football and I was suspicious of the accusations as soon as I read some of the stories online.

ESPN thought they had real time Reggie Bush like scandal on their hands involving Auburn. When they realize they really didn't, instead of letting the story die, they realized that they had an audience who wanted to keep the story going regardless of it's truthfullness. And we all know ESPN does not shy away from pushing lies to generate an audience.

Dude, Cecil Newton told the NCAA he shopped Cam. Cecil. Not the media. He admitted it, because they had the emails and phone conversations to prove it. That's not the issue at dispute: the question was whether money changed hands, which obviously never did, because the entire discussion Cecil had with MS State basically was "Umm, would you guys pay this much? "No." "Okay."

The rest of it was hyperbole, but what Cecil did (which really was nothing more than ask) is based in admitted fact, not speculation.

Did ESPN blow the whole thing up? Hell yes. But, again, Cecil Newton deserves blame for his actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, Cecil Newton told the NCAA he shopped Cam. Cecil. Not the media. He admitted it, because they had the emails and phone conversations to prove it. That's not the issue at dispute: the question was whether money changed hands, which obviously never did, because the entire discussion Cecil had with MS State basically was "Umm, would you guys pay this much? "No." "Okay."

The rest of it was hyperbole, but what Cecil did (which really was nothing more than ask) is based in admitted fact, not speculation.

Did ESPN blow the whole thing up? Hell yes. But, again, Cecil Newton deserves blame for his actions.

Who had the e-mail and phone conversation of Cecil asking for money?

And since when did "shopping" someone meant you were trying to get money for them? Maybe I'm getting old and meaning of words have changed, BUT....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh I went off and fully entertained my wife last night as my emails go to her phone as well because of my health. So she got the whole conversation as it happened.    Like I went to games in Detroit for the cup finals, I've been to games in Greensboro, Raleigh, and Chicago as well. My mom and her nurse friend double dated one of the players from when the team was in Greensboro. "He's still with the team in some compacity as well." I know people who work for the team at the arena as well. How the hell would I not be considered a fan. Only reason I haven't gone to a game since 2022 is because of my health and money situation. Last game I went to was at United Center in Chicago and me and my wife spent around 1k for glass seats and some food at the arena and we were next to the penalty box. The pictures of the hurricane players I took are lost because my phone crapped out a few weeks later. 
    • The Falcons win was a fantastic way to end the season and I think just about every Panthers fan would agree the team the coaching staff and particularly Bryce Young were impressive. We really needed that. Credit where it's due. At the same time. Now we have to establish it wasn't just a flash in the pan. We had one of those earlier in the season against the Raiders. As a tortured Panthers fan I have to acknowledge that. I know you're joking but in all seriousness I don't think the QB sneak is something for us to be concerned about in general but I would be lying to myself if I did not acknowledge that looking back at one particular game last season where we continually trotted out Eddie Pinero on 4th and short on the opponents side of the field we could use some creativity in those situations and it's also a matter of predictability. As time goes on it's something for Canales to work on and figure out. Especially with our kicker situation as it stands.
    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
×
×
  • Create New...