Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Abortion, ban it or endorse it?????


Iceberg Slim

Recommended Posts

Seems like everyone has a position on abortion these days. Some folks say its a womans right to control her body, other folks say killing a child is not anyone's right. I'd like to know what the huddle thinks...I'll kick it off, I am anti-abortion, I do in fact believe abortion is killing a child and that further folks have lately used abortion as a means for birth control......your turn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it's a woman's right, there's no way we could make exceptions for all of the scenarios out there.

that said, I sure wish more women would reconsider and at least think of all those couples out there trying desperately to have children of their own that can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very difficult issue for me. I'm totally against it but understand the woman's rights side of the argument when it comes to rape or incest. There's no real way to figure out a time period of viability and that's the trickiest part of it all. In the end, I just think you're taking away a life; end of story.

(This may end up in the tbox)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think men should stay out of this one.

I agree, there are childless couples that would love a baby and they should be given that opportunity. We also have to consider the baby-mama's perspective. For whatever reason, she is deciding that she cannot carry the baby and that's her decision alone to make.

In the case of rape...her decision alone.

In the distant past, I have escorted a few women through the protest lines to the clinic. No, not any of mine as I don't agree with abortion (as most of you know, lol) but I do beleive in a woman's right providing it is legal.

I even got in a physical fight with a few protesters and it made the news. 3 on 1 and I came out victorious. One of the A-holes even threatened to sue me for damages to his face.

I don't think the public should fund it but there are programs that will.

Either way, men ain't got a dog in that fight and should stay out of the whole legal/not legal thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it's a woman's right, there's no way we could make exceptions for all of the scenarios out there.

that said, I sure wish more women would reconsider and at least think of all those couples out there trying desperately to have children of their own that can't.

rape and if I woman has a higher percentage to die isn't a lot of exceptions. They should have the right to have an abortion.

all the other random chicks who made "poor decisions" have already made their choice when they CHOOSE to spread there legs.

No reason for men to stay out of this issue. We all are created the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

me...If you want an abortion you should have it in the 1st trimester.

I am pro life but I my opinion should no way dictate a woman's decision. I knew that if I had ever found myself in that situation I would give my opinion but also my support for their decision either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

men should absolutely stay out of the issue.

Why?

Women don't create life on their own. Plus, like I said I believe a women has a right to choose...... and when you choose to engage in sex you excerise that right. The main function of sex is reproduction. If you choose to engage in a reproductive act for other benefits than you have made your choice already.

If you don't want it......give it up. 9-10 months of a women hating being pregnant is better than killing/ending a life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Exactly, like Hill he is just an athlete that happens to be able to throw the ball.  I’m sure, with some reps and time, he could catch just fine.  That’s why I said “and catch” Taysom Hill has beat the poo out of us and many other teams during the SP years.  If we had that!!!  Owe Mang!   Edit:  I’ll add this, 4th and 1 or 2 on the goal line?  We would get 6 points with that dude! Edit 2:  he may not now or ever be a QB1, but he can avg more than 6 yards per play
    • Eh that's debatable at the end of the day. Different schools of thought and whatnot. Generally teams are not overpaying RB's anymore and they don't need to. Most are signing mid-level FA's or drafting them. But they are still fairly important. We have seen one RB drafted in the top 10 in 2025 and an RB just went 3rd overall in the draft a few days ago. You can argue how wise that is but no team generally wants to give an FA RB a huge payday. Yes having a competent and if need be dominant running game is still an asset. The main thing that has changed is how teams invest.
    • Except we have him playing safety, so there's that.
×
×
  • Create New...