Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question on last drive


SamTheRam

Recommended Posts

I thought it was stupid too. Why didn't NYG just put 15 men on the field for the entire last series then? It would have ate those last few seconds away..

I was wondering the same thing...it'd make sense to do that in such situations if you ate up the clock and only lost 5 yards for each flag....wonder if they'd call an unsportsmanlike penalty for doing that when it's so obvious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing...it'd make sense to do that in such situations if you ate up the clock and only lost 5 yards for each flag....wonder if they'd call an unsportsmanlike penalty for doing that when it's so obvious?

They would definately lose draft picks for doing it in the super bowl. And the competition commitee would change the rules in the offseason like they probably will for the two things the giants did this season. (fake injuries vs rams and the penalty were talking about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penalties that are called before the ball is snapped like illegal procedure result in an automatic penalty and the clock is reset to what it was it was before the play started if the refs don't come in and get it stopped before the ball is snapped. Teams can't refuse or accept the penalty. Penalties that occur after the ball is snapped (which this was because if someone had gotten off the field before the ball was snapped it wouldn't have been a penalty) allows the other team to accept or decline the penalty based on the outcome of the play. The time it takes to run the play does come off the clock regardless of whether the team takes the play or the penalty. So it was going to be 9 seconds regardless of whether NE took or refused the penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing...it'd make sense to do that in such situations if you ate up the clock and only lost 5 yards for each flag....wonder if they'd call an unsportsmanlike penalty for doing that when it's so obvious?

If Brady saw that you would just spike the ball which takes little to no time off the clock and get a 5 yard penalty. Since the clock doesn't start until the ball is snapped if they had too many people on the next play you would do the same thing again. You could move 50 yards in about 15 seconds. Then on the last play if they did that you would keep getting more plays since the game can't end on a defensive penalty.

No one would be stupid enough to do that over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right, thanks. Wasn't aware that if someone on defense jumped offsides and you took the penalty, that time ran off the clock. Thought it was a dead ball penalty.

It can be a dead ball foul if the refs stop the play because the defensive player is unabated to the quarterback and it occurs well before the snap of the ball. If the defensive player moves across the line which induces the offensive player to false start then it is automatically assessed and time is reset since the play never occurred. If the defensive player moves offsides right before the ball is snapped then play isn't stopped and the offense can accept or refuse the penalty based on the result of the play and time does elapse off the clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...