Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2010 Panthers vs this years Bobcats


Grammer

Recommended Posts

Being a native of Charlotte, I agree with those that quit watching or said fug the NBA when

the Hornets left. I loved the Hornets as much as I do the panthers now until it was certain they were leaving. I quit watching right at that point. Never been able to embrace the Bobcats.

Which reminds me of this hillarious video.EDIT:vid nsfw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bobcats are worse because not only do they suck but the structure of basketball doesn't given them an equal chance to succeed. Small market teams like the Bobcats are not going to be able to keep their stars because there is no hard salary cap like in football. Sure we have some promising rookies that when they get good, they will go elsewhere to the highest bidder in a big market where they can get more press just like James did in Cleveland and others before him.

With the Panthers we knew that we were a QB and some playmakers away from contending again. The team still had some playmakers and could recover. But basketball seems like a different animal. Players are about themselves and are about individual stats not the team. If they play well and the team loses they are still stars and can look forward to a big payday somewhere else. They don't have a franchise tag and you can't keep players on the team who want to play elsewhere.

Guys like Newton say they want to be here and make the Panthers great. Other than lip service, do most basketball players do the same? Not from what I have seen.

So yeah the Bobcats are abysmal and have less of a chance to turn that around. If their players excel, they can look forward to going to a big market and getting big bucks but won't be here long-term. We might contend for a year or two but build a consistent winner?????

That is why I am a PSL owner and have turned down season tickets for the Bobcats. Who wants to go to watch them get blown out by 30 points on a nightly basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bobcats are worse because not only do they suck but the structure of basketball doesn't given them an equal chance to succeed. Small market teams like the Bobcats are not going to be able to keep their stars because there is no hard salary cap like in football. Sure we have some promising rookies that when they get good, they will go elsewhere to the highest bidder in a big market where they can get more press just like James did in Cleveland and others before him.

With the Panthers we knew that we were a QB and some playmakers away from contending again. The team still had some playmakers and could recover. But basketball seems like a different animal. Players are about themselves and are about individual stats not the team. If they play well and the team loses they are still stars and can look forward to a big payday somewhere else. They don't have a franchise tag and you can't keep players on the team who want to play elsewhere.

Guys like Newton say they want to be here and make the Panthers great. Other than lip service, do most basketball players do the same? Not from what I have seen.

So yeah the Bobcats are abysmal and have less of a chance to turn that around. If their players excel, they can look forward to going to a big market and getting big bucks but won't be here long-term. We might contend for a year or two but build a consistent winner?????

That is why I am a PSL owner and have turned down season tickets for the Bobcats. Who wants to go to watch them get blown out by 30 points on a nightly basis.

While I agree with parts of this, Blake Griffin, Chris Paul and the Clippers kind of prove the "sucking now means sucking forever, our stars will leave" idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree with parts of this, Blake Griffin, Chris Paul and the Clippers kind of prove the "sucking now means sucking forever, our stars will leave" idea.

Prove or disprove???? Either way there are always some exceptions to the rule but you don't throw out a rule because there is an exception to it. For that matter you could have brought up San Antonio or even Orlando and Dwight Howard. It still doesn't mean that Charlotte will retain their stars. Jordan has already dumped his stars once his payroll went into the top 10, why would he suddenly become a big spender. We are 13th in attendance despite being awful. Dumping this year is a big mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree with this. I live in Wilmington NC and even here there is more Charlotte Hornets gear than Bobcats. It seems odd but I fully believe rebranding the Bobcats as the Hornets would revive the fan base.

Because the bobcats name has, and will always, suck.

Hornets or bust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, the NBA died when the Hornets left Charlotte. I was actually at the last-ever Hornets game in Charlotte Coliseum... oddly enough, it was my first Hornets game in Charlotte Coliseum. Freaking George Shinn...

I was there, too, against the Nets. I had hope they'd come back for game 6 that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the bobcats name has, and will always, suck.

Hornets or bust

Give us back the Hornets name

Give New Orleans the Jazz (what Jazz is in Utah?)

Give the Lakers name to Utah (Salt Lake City; what lake is in LA?)

Give the Bobcats to LA.

win-win-win-lose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nominee for Worst Post of the Year

kemba has struggled with his shot but at least he looks like he's playing the correct sport, which is more than pickles can say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Bobcats season ticket holder I understand what MJ is doing, he blew up the team to start fresh as being a perennial 6-7th seed was not sufficient for him (a la Atlanta Hawks). He got rid of heavy contracts and has set the team up with young talent and cap space becoming available.

Players coming off the books next year:

Diaw- 9 million

Najarea- 2.6 million

Diop- 7 million

Carroll- 3.5 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...