Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Stewart The Most Elusive Rb In The Nfl?


jtnc

Recommended Posts

What you fail to realize is you also beat the same dead horse..... from the opposite side.

Absolutely. I will be glad to not comment again if you do the same. Problem is that you won't last a week. You are the one obsessed with William's contract. I am just here to give balance to your constant ranting and point out the flaws in your arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong again. Stewart only appeared in 14 games in 2010.

Post like this show you are more concerned with arguing than anything.

Point of my post was clear. Injury hasn't been an issue in regards to Stewart being on the field.

So correction - Stewart has suited up for 63 of 65 total NFL games. Easy mistake. Doesn't change the point made.

Williams 51 of 65 in the same window of time.

People complaining about Stewart being hurt all the time is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. I will be glad to not comment again if you do the same. Problem is that you won't last a week. You are the one obsessed with William's contract. I am just here to give balance to your constant ranting and point out the flaws in your arguments.

I am not complaining about Williams anymore. I have accepted his deal. What you need to realize is his contract impacts other conversations and moves going forward. So I can't wipe all Williams talk off the map.

I think after this year we should let Stewart walk.....that is not bitching about Williams. His deal does impact that. In reality, as long as we have RBs who fit the scheme I don't care who they actually are.

Team has changed. Double Trouble was the most important aspect of this team. We needed to put the load on them just to be respectable. Times are changing.....it is all about Cam. Money and talent investments should change going forward.

Some fans need to move out team of the Fox mold of where to stockpile your talent

Newton is so good that you don't need great RBs. Find RBs who fit the scheme and you can invest elsewhere. Jake, Moore, and Clausen needed Double Trouble. Keeping them intact is a luxury and waste of money you could be using elsewhere.

Lecture all you want the p55 viewpoint is the only logical approach....it isn't. That is why the moment Tolbert was signed NFL world started talking about Stewarts future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post like this show you are more concerned with arguing than anything.

Point of my post was clear. Injury hasn't been an issue in regards to Stewart being on the field.

So correction - Stewart has suited up for 63 of 65 total NFL games. Easy mistake. Doesn't change the point made.

Williams 51 of 65 in the same window of time.

People complaining about Stewart being hurt all the time is silly.

Peple saying he has never a game are just a s silly. Doing a little of research before posting is a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not complaining about Williams anymore. I have accepted his deal. What you need to realize is his contract impacts other conversations and moves going forward. So I can't wipe all Williams talk off the map.

I think after this year we should let Stewart walk.....that is not bitching about Williams. His deal does impact that. In reality, as long as we have RBs who fit the scheme I don't care who they actually are.

Team has changed. Double Trouble was the most important aspect of this team. We needed to put the load on them just to be respectable. Times are changing.....it is all about Cam. Money and talent investments should change going forward.

Some fans need to move out team of the Fox mold of where to stockpile your talent

Newton is so good that you don't need great RBs. Find RBs who fit the scheme and you can invest elsewhere. Jake, Moore, and Clausen needed Double Trouble. Keeping them intact is a luxury and waste of money you could be using elsewhere.

Lecture all you want the p55 viewpoint is the only logical approach....it isn't. That is why the moment Tolbert was signed NFL world started talking about Stewarts future

Gee nobody could have guessed where you stand so say it one more time, LOL.

I don't agree, the Panthers don't agree and most importantly the FO and coaches don't agree. Does it matter what other teams and the media think?????

No..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until I see a "dime-a-dozen" pedestrian RB getting the job done for us without turning the ball over, I will continue to believe that this type player doesn't exist. We might get lucky and find a diamond in the rough, but I don't think RB's are as interchangable as some might believe.

BTW, I don't regard Tolbert as being one of these type players. I think we got a deal on a "diamond in the rough" type player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BenJarvis Green-Ellis is a pedestrian RB that never fumbles and gets the dob done, so it's not impossible.

Well he was a 1000 yard rusher in 2010, but dropped off in 2011 to 3.7 ypc. This was in NE though and they are most certainly a pass heavy attack.

Looks like the Bengals are giving him 4 million this year with 1.6 million available if he hits some incentives. That's not exactly what I'd call "dime-a-dozen". He does have solid ball protection skills though...

http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/rap_sheet/index.php/2012/03/24/examining-the-contract-for-bengals-wr-benjarvus-green-ellis-and-wondering-why/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang... Never thought of it like that.

Probably a good thing since we aren't paying them anywhere close to 16 million. The salary for Williams and Stewart this year is 6.7 million for the two of them. That is less than the franchise tag for one back which is 7.9 million. Their cap hit which includes the prorated signing bonuses is right at 12 million. Until we actually pay them 16 million we can hold off doing the math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your point, but even if Tolbert was not on the roster, Hatter is right--$16 million-That is $1 million per game--for 20 carries? That means every time Stew or DWill run the ball, they are paid $50,000. That comes to $10,000 per yard gained during a good year.

People on here (not you) think they can have everything. They fail to consider the fact that keeping 3 RBs at nearly $20 million takes away from other positions. You gotta spread the wealth.

1310173251001.gif

your post would be more interesting with facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...