Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please Reassure Me Our Fo Is Gonna Trade J.stew


Dash Global

Recommended Posts

With the signing of Tolbert, the FO has to trade J.Stew right?!?! For a 2nd or 3rd round pick or another player.

It would be stupid to keep 3 starting caliber backs on a roster when we have other wholes / needs that can be filled by moving one of the 3.

Hurney, please find a way to get a 2nd round pick for Stew!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to keep Jstew.

Why would you wanna keep Stew when we have Williams and Tolbert. Both quality starting backs in their own right when we have pressing holes / needs that can be filled with moving one of the 3 RB's which if occurred would be Stew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep..they said they want to keep him...most likely nobody will deal the big pick unless he negotiates a deal moving forward...wouldn't do that now with us, so he does it for team X? Doubtful IMO, unless the dream scenario presents itself (Seattle). So you can have him and franchise year two in trade for a second...if we accepted. Can't see it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The browns need a RB and we need the #4 spot to get clairborne. Hopefully the FO can connect the dots

Id rather have Coples over Clairborne. Im not big on drafting CB's in the top 10 unless our DE, LT, and QB positions are locked down by prow bowl players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tolbert can play RB. If im not mistaken he had like 1000 yards at SD.

Still have Williams on top.

Would be stupid not to trade Stew if we can get a 2nd or a 3rd.

We have some pressing needs that need to be filled. Stew is too good to be a 2nd string RB imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...