Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sorenson Wants Wr, Blackmon


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Tom Sorenson admits that he won't cry if we take Coples, Poe, or a solid defensive player, but he is hoping that Blackmon slips down, or that we possibly trade up.

Basically he is saying what more than a few people believe: Sometimes you just have to strike while the iron is hot. Anyway...here is the link. Moreover, he said remember how most of you were down on reaching for Newton...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we the only top 5 offense going crazy over WR?

Well except maybe the Pat's but atleast all their WR are old.

All the others have deeper recieving options...also there stud leading the pack on most is younger than Smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the others have deeper recieving options...also there stud leading the pack on most is younger than Smitty.

Colston and Henderson really. I love Graham But we match up well with their other weapons.

I'll give you the Pack.

Detriot really only has Megatron.

I'll take #89, Lafell, Gettis, Olson over dertriot's crew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that, notwithstanding his last line, but Sorenson is not crazy. How could we really leave Blackmon on the table at 9? Seriously.

Yes!!!

We had a top 5 offense adding another Wr won't make us stop people from putting up 485 points. Which is what we gave up last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colston and Henderson really. I love Graham But we match up well with their other weapons.

I'll give you the Pack.

Detriot really only has Megatron.

I'll take #89, Lafell, Gettis, Olson over dertriot's crew.

I'd have to take Detriot. Smitty at this stage of his career ain't on Megatrons level. TEs are decent. Other WRs are probably close to to being a wash overall.

I agree on NO though.

I think GB, NE and Det edge us out overall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you act like if Blackmon or Floyd is here. Were going to score 45 points a game.

Even if that was possible. I don't want to be the team that has to out score everybody.

Cam needs to grow with whoever will be his #1 WR for the bulk of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to take Detriot. Smitty at this stage of his career ain't on Megatrons level. TEs are decent. Other WRs are probably close to to being a wash overall.

I agree on NO though.

I think GB, NE and Det edge us out overall

I'll give you Greenbay, NE not really WR but the 2 TE are beast. Other then Megatron I'm not giving you the lions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...