Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scp Mock 7.0


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

Assuming no trades. I'm also not going with my gut feeling that Claiborne drops to us, which I believe has a better chance of happening than most realize.

1st: Melvin Ingram, DE, South Carolina

TBH, I like Dontari Poe here, but it's not looking likely at this point. With all the talk about Coples, so many people have overlooked a guy I think is the better player. Ingram is, IMO, the best pass rusher in this draft. He can rush from OLB or from DE, which is perfect for Rivera's multiple look defense. It's entirely possible he's gone by our pick, but there's a very good chance he'll be there too.

2nd: Amini Silatolu, OG, Midwestern State

This isn't a big name prospect, but he's going to go a lot sooner than most people think. With Wharton gone we have to start investing in the OL - especially the interior OL - and Silatolu is a guy we could plug in day one as a starter.

4th: Keenan Robinson, OLB, Texas

Rivera has said he wants to add depth at linebacker and we have been noted as having shown interest in Robinson. He's a solid prospect with good upside, particularly in the 4th round.

5th: Evan Rodriguez, TE, Temple

With Shockey's status uncertain we need a young developmental TE who we can groom for the future alongside Olsen. Rodriguez was used similarly to how Aaron Hernandez was used in college and while some say he's a better fit as an h-back, I like his potential at TE.

6th: Bryan Anger, P, California

Anger is pretty much the consensus top punter in the draft. He could be gone before this pick, but most teams won't draft a punter too early.

6th: Winston Guy, S, Kentucky

For whatever reason, his stock has fallen somewhat. If we can get him this late it would be a very good pick, though. He has a lot of upside as a potential starter down the road. God knows we need someone to push Sherrod Martin if Nakamura can't do so.

7th: Delvin Johnson, DT, Marshall

In the 7th round you pretty much just look for players with some upside that you can develop. It certainly wouldn't hurt to get another body at DT. Who knows, maybe we'll find a diamond in the rough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I've been comparing the two of them it's clear that Ingram has a lot more lower body strength than Norwood, with similar speed and mobility. That would certainly make Ingram a much better DE prospect than Norwood, who seems to be more like a slow LB, or a weak DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as any mock dosent have brockers with the first pick then I'm ok with it.

But I haven't really thought about Ingram at 9. He seems super athletic. Especially for a DE. I think he's the most athletic pass rusher that's for sure. Idk if he's the best pass rusher though. But man I wouldn't complain at all with this.

As far as the other picks. Idk much about the guard in the second. We need depth and possibly a starter on the o line but I would rather have maybe a cb there or a DT and possibly a safety.

I'd probably go with S Harrison smith but good mock man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my dream mock

1st-Quinton Coples DE: Obviously a great pickup for our mediocre DL. He was a monster at the senior bowl and is a much better player than his stats say.

2nd-Stephen Hill WR: He has the potential to be the best WR of this draft. Standing at an imposing 6'4, he ran a blazing 4.36 dash and had a 40'' vert. Averaging 30ypc this season, he has monstrous upside.

4th-Jamell Fleming CB: A very solid CB who could start in the nfl. In 2011 he had 60 tackles, 10 PBU's, 2 int's and 2FF

5th- Jaye Howard DT: The anchor of a very underrated Florida DL. In 2011 he had 65 tackles 10 TFL 5.5 Sacks and 2 PBU'S

6th-Danny Trevathan OLB: this guy is the steal of the draft. Playing in the SEC with a mediocre surrounding cast at Kentucky he had a Beast season in 2011. His stats were insane with 144 tackles 11.5 TFL 3 Sacks 4 int's 5FF and 5PBU's.

Comp. Bryan Anger P: this team needs a Punter and he is the best one available In the draft.

7th- Cliff Harris CB: Many forget that coming into 2011 he was a potential 1st round pick with 33 tackles 6 int's 17 PBU'S and 4 PR TD's. If Rivera can give him some discipline, he could not only be a great CB but also a phenomenal PR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

I'd probably want a corner earlier than a guard.

And for anyone that thinks Ingram is only a 3-4 LB is nuts. Ingram has lined up at 4-3 OLB, 4-3 DE, and 4-3 DT, and he excelled at all of those positions. Just because he is speedy and smaller doesn't mean he is only suited to play rush LB, he also has exceptional power and strength which makes him so versatile in our defense.

Coples is great, but with the questions about his motor, and Ingrams ability to move around, I have to give Ingram the slight edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably the worst draft I seen so far. No to Ingram .

I don't think Hurney is going to draft another small DE in his lifetime ever again.

Ingram had potential but not in our 43.

Can guarantee that he'll be playing for a 34 D.

Small? Ingram is 6'1 and close to 270. That's not small for a 4-3 DE. Everette Brown was barely 240 when we drafted him; it's not even close to the same thing and they're not even remotely similar players. Ingram is a MUCH more complete player than Brown ever was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small? Ingram is 6'1 and close to 270. That's not small for a 4-3 DE. Everette Brown was barely 240 when we drafted him; it's not even close to the same thing and they're not even remotely similar players. Ingram is a MUCH more complete player than Brown ever was.

yeah it is. 6'2 is the low end of what a 4-3 DE should be, really you want a guy that's 6'4 - 6'5. I like Ingram but not for us, he'll almost certainly go to a 3-4 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...