Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Apparently "love" Luke Kuechly


Gabeking

Recommended Posts

Point is Gary Guyton is still out there.

Rocky Mac is out there

Omar Gaither is still out there.

NO DT or DE are out there.

We tried Gaither last year and he was too old and got hurt, Gary Guyton is depth nothing more and wouldn't be an upgrade. The last ranked Patriot defense didn't want to resign him so why should we. Most folks have McIntosh pegged as a Will backer and we have Anderson there already. We need a Sam and he might not be a great fit.

We don't need any DTs and DEs really. If there is an exceptional guy in the draft at number 9 we probably will pick them up. Otherwise there is no compelling reason to pick one up in free agency. Not at what they cost for a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically we have not gotten any kind of longevity in drafting first round linebackers like we have at other positions on defense such as CB and DE. the fact that people think we're back at square one even after using a disproportionate amount of resources at the linebacker position is very telling.

Davis may never be a starter again. It may take years for Beason to get back to play at a level he once was. This does not mean you spend your highest pick on the biggest most bestest linebacker you can find once again. This doesn't justify continuing to ignore positions that have hindered us for years.

So Claiborne or Coples or best DT on the board

Silly also to not draft a guy bc others have gotten hurt who play the position. Doesn't mean to let LB become the new DT spot in terms of neglect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can he play weakside like derrick brooks or thomas davis?!?!?!

Thomas David any play weak side like Thomas Davis. Also, both is those excelled as WLB in a cover 2....which we won't run allegedly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silly also to not draft a guy bc others have gotten hurt who play the position. Doesn't mean to let LB become the new DT spot in terms of neglect

Exactly if we use that logic then we won't draft an offensive tackle since Otah has not played in 2 years. You would think folks would have figured out that the linebackers were the single biggest reason we sucked last year. Much more so than the safeties and the D line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly if we use that logic then we won't draft an offensive tackle since Otah has not played in 2 years. You would think folks would have figured out that the linebackers were the single biggest reason we sucked last year. Much more so than the safeties and the D line.

LB play was pathetic last year. Made Godfrey suck worse bc he was asked to help the LBs do there job. Rarely saw our D scheme even in use.

If you have 2 great DEs you can get by with average DTs if you are strong behind them. Few teams want to pound the ball. We weren't abused just bc we had weak DTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tried Gaither last year and he was too old and got hurt, Gary Guyton is depth nothing more and wouldn't be an upgrade. The last ranked Patriot defense didn't want to resign him so why should we. Most folks have McIntosh pegged as a Will backer and we have Anderson there already. We need a Sam and he might not be a great fit.

We don't need any DTs and DEs really. If there is an exceptional guy in the draft at number 9 we probably will pick them up. Otherwise there is no compelling reason to pick one up in free agency. Not at what they cost for a good one.

Gaither is 28 so wrong!!!

Guyton still has talent and would be a nice pick up.

And rocky Mac can play both will and sam so can James Anderson.

Dude don't shoot the messager because there are solid LB in FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gaither is 28 so wrong!!!

Guyton still has talent and would be a nice pick up.

And rocky Mac can play both will and sam so can James Anderson.

Dude don't shoot the messager because there are solid LB in FA.

So you ignored that Gaither was a Panther last year and we didn't resign him and he was not very good.

And you ignored that Guyton played on the worse defense in the NFL and they didn't retain him because they wanted an upgrade but we should take him?

McIntosh is the only one that I would consider of the three. If we don't pick up anyone in the draft better and he were willing to sign a 1 year deal to see what he could do, he might be a good pick up. I heard that he had a workout with Miami two days ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you ignored that Gaither was a Panther last year and we didn't resign him and he was not very good.

And you ignored that Guyton played on the worse defense in the NFL and they didn't retain him because they wanted an upgrade but we should take him?

McIntosh is the only one that I would consider of the three. If we don't pick up anyone in the draft better and he were willing to sign a 1 year deal to see what he could do, he might be a good pick up. I heard that he had a workout with Miami two days ago.

1. We haven't resigned him yet. The FA season hasn't ended yet right? He could still be brought back. Not to mention he was hurt alot of the season.

2. Cj played on the 28th worst defense in the league does that mean he sucks? FA isn't over this whole stupid poo your on about him not being signed "YET" doesn't work. He could still signed back with the Pats. Lofton and Hawthorn weren't signed in the 1st week of FA either.

3. Well good my point was if we needed LB after the draft we can get them. But DT, DE, and CB are getting very thin to slim and none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

once we IRed McClain and Fua and replaced them, our run defense got suddenly better. If we only had better linebackers, we would have been much better across the board.

lol no it really did not. The texans still gashed us through the ground and the saints somehow found time to get 200+ rushing yards while they were passing all over us for north of 400

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol no it really did not. The texans still gashed us through the ground and the saints somehow found time to get 200+ rushing yards while they were passing all over us for north of 400

Again anecdotal evidence is not worth anything. Go back and look at the facts. That is yards per carry. In the first 4 games we gave up 554 yards on 90 carries (didn't include quarterback numbers) for a yards per carry of 6.15. In the last 4 games with McClain And Fua on IR we gave up 472 yards on 91 carries for a yards per carry of 5.17 which is a yard per carry better.

You should know by now when I say something like that I have already done the research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...