Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carlos Rogers Says Gregg W Had A Bounty Program With Redskins


Panthro

Recommended Posts

Based on what Carlos said, I see nothing wrong with it. I know everytime the Eagles played the Skins everyone would joke as to who's head Williams had the most money on that week. Everyteam had something similar but Williams didn't try to hide it. Now paying players to intentionally injure another player via cheapshot is a diffferent story. I think somewhere along the way his maniacal mind lost grip with reality and he took things too far.

It went on to guys just suggesting stuff in a room,” Rogers said. “If you knock this person out, let’s say a receiver, he comes across the middle. Safety knocks him out, a legal hit, you get this amount of money.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then there's no reason to punish the Saints

The Saints organization is being fined for not stopping it after they were told to stop it. Loomis was aware and did nothing. To punish the redskins the same way you would have to know the FO knew about it,. were warned to stop it and then they did nothing or even worse tried to cover it up. Very different scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see a rationale for punishing the Redskins organization for this, most ikely via fine. Ditto the Bills.

On practical terms though, Williams and probably most of the people who would have been involved in the whole thing are long gone from both organizations. Don't know that it makes sense to penalize the current staffs and rosters on a performance basis (draft picks, suspensions, etc) given that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints organization is being fined for not stopping it after they were told to stop it. Loomis was aware and did nothing. To punish the redskins the same way you would have to know the FO knew about it,. were warned to stop it and then they did nothing or even worse tried to cover it up. Very different scenarios.

i know i just hate the redskins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...