Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Would Your Draft Moves Be


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

if you could do WHATEVER you wanted in the draft.. (within reason), what would it be.. what scenarios would you try to make play out??

for me, If I'm carolinas GM..i trade back to about an early second round pick in exchange for a decent DT and a 3rd round pick. Draft Janoris Jenkins with the 40th. Trade Stewart for a 2nd and 3rd pick and a decent skills posistion player for the depth chart. That fills all our needs, gives us Depth, and Frees up Cap space..it also gives us 3 extra early picks to give Cam some targets and more defense (and we could pay them too!) If for some reason (which i doubt) all the good CB's get taken before 40.. then oh well, we use our pick for some serious line reinforments..this plan works for me..

i wanna make it clear, i like Stewart, and i would like to see him stay.. so lets not get into the bs drama that accompanies any mention of him. I want to know what your scenario is for putting the best chance of winning on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade down out of the first round and load up on 3rd round picks so we can have a roster full of Dan Connor caliber guys (hopefully mostly white). We need to get back under the radar, this is all making me nervous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you just trade Stewart for not only a 2nd, but also a 3rd, AND a player?

hes spent his entire career splitting carriers, hes not beat up, hes just about garunteed 1000 yards a season, and we wont slap a franchise tag on him.. sounds good to me. he is an instant offense changer. and im thinking like a special teams guy, or a 2nd/3rd on the depth chart...not a big deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it doesn't break down to one scenario, but addressing two important components of defense we're lacking in (DL, secondary) would be a big help in order to combat the ever increasing spread formations in this league both in better coverage and giving the QB less time in the pocket. For defensive linemen you also need to look for who also defends the run better, and you need to get a franchise type player in the top 10. You don't draft insurance, you don't draft guys who don't play in key positions. Also, CBs and 4-3 DEs are two of the most expensive positions to pay for a good free agent.

So at 9, Claiborne, Coples, or best DT.

at 40, whatever you didn't draft from the first round (so, for instance, if you picked Coples at 9, pick either a CB or DT, depending on where there is better value; as a 2nd example, you could take Fletcher Cox at 9 and Nick Perry if he's there at 40). Perry's probably my 2nd favorite DE besides Coples.

not worried about spending our highest picks on bolstering the offensive line. most great linemen are had in later rounds anyway (Carl Nicks was a 4th round pick for instance). You don't need 8 first round picks to have a good linebacking core.

We also need a really good punt returner. I'd love Joe Adams but I feel like he's just going to be overdrafted by either a team that doesn't have many glaring holes, a team that just doesn't give a poo or a team with too many picks between the 2nd and 3rd rounds. If it was between him and a "scat back" i'd pick Adams because he can also contribute as a WR but tbh this team is so fuging busy this offseason retooling a record-setting running game I wouldn't be surprised if they took the scat back (even though Stewart and Tolbert had like a combined 100 receptions last season between them)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you could do WHATEVER you wanted in the draft.. (within reason), what would it be.. what scenarios would you try to make play out??

for me, If I'm carolinas GM..i trade back to about an early second round pick in exchange for a decent DT and a 3rd round pick. Draft Janoris Jenkins with the 40th. Trade Stewart for a 2nd and 3rd pick and a decent skills posistion player for the depth chart. That fills all our needs, gives us Depth, and Frees up Cap space..it also gives us 3 extra early picks to give Cam some targets and more defense (and we could pay them too!) If for some reason (which i doubt) all the good CB's get taken before 40.. then oh well, we use our pick for some serious line reinforments..this plan works for me..

i wanna make it clear, i like Stewart, and i would like to see him stay.. so lets not get into the bs drama that accompanies any mention of him. I want to know what your scenario is for putting the best chance of winning on the field.

tumblr_lndlmxFV1m1qziz1ro1_500.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hes spent his entire career splitting carriers, hes not beat up, hes just about garunteed 1000 yards a season, and we wont slap a franchise tag on him.. sounds good to me. he is an instant offense changer. and im thinking like a special teams guy, or a 2nd/3rd on the depth chart...not a big deal

We would be LUCKY to get a 2nd rd pick for him. Extremely lucky. RB's have little trade value, especially one due a contact at the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...