Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best Band Of All-Time Game (From A Semi-Objective Standpoint)


Sapper

Recommended Posts

I came up with this among friends whom I like to debate music with, but wanted to share with the huddle to get input. I am sure a lot of people will be 'tl;dr' and that is fine, but I thought it would be interesting to give it a shot.

Harking back onto the best songwriters of all time thread, I thought of a make-shift way of figuring out the greatest band of all time informally.

Digitaldreamdoor is one of the few sites that has extensive lists of top 100 of just about everything. Ranker is up there as is RollingStone (but RS makes the list only readable 1 by 1, which would be more time consuming than this already is).

So the rules are: Either by your point of view, or by a site you find like Digitaldreamdoor, you have to rank 5 categories by best all time:

1. Vocalist

2. Songwriting

3. Guitarist

4. Bassist

5. Drummer

I would include album and single but I figured that would skew the ratings too much since one song could change the order tremendously. Once you get your numbers for each, you divide that by the number of band members involved. This makes it fair because a band like Rush has 3 members since Geddy Lee sings and plays bass. Also, The Doors had a keyboardist, but I am not counting that as an instrument since not every band has one.

I admit there are fallacies to this game. Elton John is technically a 1 man band, as is Billy Joel; Bob Dylan, etc... So they would rank only for singing/songwriting. Also - I could be missing a huge aspect or be silly for neglecting keyboard or another instrument. So feel free to give input/criticism of the way the rules should and could work.

I used http://digitaldreamdoor.com for my rankings. This is all subjective; so nobody is right or wrong - but it was a topic that intrigued me.

I came up with 5 bands that would probably be in the top 5 in some order (and I wanted to try Rush to see where they would land).

So here are my results:

1. The Who: AVG - 15.25

2. Led Zeppelin: AVG - 21

3. The Beatles: AVG - 21.5

4. The Rolling Stones: AVG - 84

5. Pink Floyd: AVG - 91.75

?. Rush: AVG - 144

Entwhistle and Moon carries The Who with 2 and 3 by position respectively, and where my pick for who would win (no pun intended) Zeppelin got hurt by Bass and Songwriting, 21 and 51 respectively. If Paul was a little higher on vocals the Beatles might have taken it (33). Jagger was 103 twice for bass and vocals - that did them in. Pink Floyd's highest was 14 with Gilmour on guitar. Peart and Lee were 1 and 7 respectively for bass and drum, but got killed on lyrics (not even on the list) and vocals (197).

If we were to factor in all time #1 hits I am sure The Beatles take the cake. Same with highest grossing albums. Hell, maybe I should include The Eaglles in my final writeup.

Yea, you might say I have too much time on my hands, but it is a piece I am working on for a site I sometimes write for. So any input would be great :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm

Zeppelin is high on this list. Page, Plant, Bonham. Poor JPJ is usually the odd man out but very underrated IMO.

From top to bottom you can't go wrong with the Who.

One of my fav is Van Halen. I'll put their 1st 4 albums against any.

So I did Van Halen and they averaged 125.5. Hagar finished 20 slots better than Roth. Eddie was 3rd on guitarists. That seems to low for them, so maybe I should include albums and hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...