Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Houses Still So Overpriced?


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

gubmint just re-valuated my matthews house 15k more than I paid for it in 2009 and even more overpriced for what it is worth. Even though you're looking in union co, the meck county re-valuation may be playing a role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gubmint just re-valuated my matthews house 15k more than I paid for it in 2009 and even more overpriced for what it is worth. Even though you're looking in union co, the meck county re-valuation may be playing a role.

Taxes and People not wanting to take loses on houses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a house I like in Union county. It's for sale for $175k, valued at $170k and assessor estimated at $200k... I will offer this dude $160k on Monday. He can take it or leave it. Major banks will start another round of foreclosures after election. I don't mind waiting for few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asking price and selling price are two different things. I stole the place I just bought in Jan, The owner now lives in CA and had been trying to sell it for 3 years. He had to bring $35,000 to the closing. Just have to look for the right deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gubmint just re-valuated my matthews house 15k more than I paid for it in 2009 and even more overpriced for what it is worth. Even though you're looking in union co, the meck county re-valuation may be playing a role.

Mine doubled in it's assessed value. Quityerbitching. The shortage on my mortgage each month is now almost 400 bucks more. Yay reassessment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually because the banks are artifically keeping the prices high. Even though the banks are hold and continue to seize record numbers of properties they are only selling them off in small waves, rather than massive dumps. There has actually been this weird phenomenon of banks over inflating the value of homes that they hold the loans on so as to prevent various morgage restructuring for the owners.

Banks might be indulging a bad habit that could be worsening the foreclosure crisis, according to recent research from economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

The economists, Thomas Fitzpatrick and Stephan Whitaker, did some analysis of the Ohio real estate market and found a disquieting trend. Banks seem to be over-valuing many of the homes they foreclose on, making it less likely that homeowners can get a loan modification and more likely that they'll end up losing their property.

It is not clear how or why banks are getting an inflated idea of the value of so many properties - especially since foreclosed homes tend to drag down real estate prices for the whole neighborhood - but the trend seems to be real. Fitzpatrick and Whitaker note that at foreclosed-home auctions in the Cleveland area, banks routinely sell their properties for much less than what they paid to buy them from the sheriff, meaning banks are high-balling their estimates of what those homes are worth.

If they were not doing that, the economists write, then maybe they'd be more willing to extend loan modifications to Ohio homeowners who then wouldn't have to give up their houses.

This is not the first evidence that banks have made the foreclosure crisis more pronounced. The widespread practice of robo-signing - banks moving forward with foreclosures based on forged or unread paperwork - has significantly impeded the housing recovery. And additional signs have shown wrongful foreclosures continue to be a problem across the nation.

http://www.presstv.com/usdetail/232055.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually because the banks are artifically keeping the prices high. Even though the banks are hold and continue to seize record numbers of properties they are only selling them off in small waves, rather than massive dumps. There has actually been this weird phenomenon of banks over inflating the value of homes that they hold the loans on so as to prevent various morgage restructuring for the owners.

http://www.presstv.c...ail/232055.html

I'm not surprised at all. Makes sense. It fits the bank's MO.

Banks screwed the people.

We bail them out.

Banks continue to screw the people.

Glad I didn't go through a bank for this latest home purchase. I am one of the few people in the world banks don't make money on. Only thing I pay is $24/year for check imaging on my checking account (personal reason for this). But with the paper statements I receive, mailed ads for credit card offers (I pay 0% interest on credit cards), in the long run, they are paying to keep me as a customer and to have contact with me.

I just wish I could control how much insurance companies and the oil industry make off of me like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how everyone who reads the paper becomes a real estate professional.

The market is better, rates are the lowest they have ever been, money is fairly easy to get, down payments are very small right now.

It's not that hard to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how everyone who reads the paper becomes a real estate professional.

The market is better, rates are the lowest they have ever been, money is fairly easy to get, down payments are very small right now.

It's not that hard to understand.

Which bank are you a mortgage broker for again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'll wait a lil longer. Bank will be forced to sell soon. Otherwise it will start negatively affecting their books. So they reporting houses at much more than what it really worth, it causes their balance sheet to look nicer than what it really is. So when you look at their assets it says $15 billion but really its only about $8billion. SEC? Where the fug are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce is like Jerry Seinfeld.  Bad jokes, very limited on screen charisma, and a bad actor.  But they surrounded him with the greatest supporting cast of all time (writing included) and you can name the show after the guy.  Unfortunately QB does not work that way.
    • I just feel like TE is an excuse to the BPA rule, unless you really just have NOBODY at TE, which I personally don't feel is the case for us with the 3 we have right now. Even if you were to say a TE was our actual top ranked player on the board when our 1st round pick is on the clock, I can't see it being such a big gap between him and players at positions of more of a need to where it's then a dumb decision to not take the highest ranked player left on the board. Because yes, a game changing TE can really change your team, but at the same time, it also is the least important position in today's game, since realistically the best TEs are really just big WRs these days anyways, so if you have a good enough WR (and RB) room, TE becomes less of a need. I also think if Coker and Horn Jr pan out, XL could be used in more of a TE type of role where we line him up in the slot and hope to get favorable matchups against smaller DBs or slower LBs.
×
×
  • Create New...