Brockers Vs. Cox.... Since I Enjoyed The Other One.

[ClarkCam]

These are two guys I know little about. I know Cox is supposedly better at getting at the passer, while Brockers is better at stuffing the run. If this is true, I think I rather have Brockers, let our LB's run free.

Thoughts?

You can even throw Coples in here if you want to mix him into the top DL for the 9th pick.

[Dex]

Happy with either. Prefer Cox and Chandler Jones in the 2nd.

[Marguide]

I think Cox will be an impact player from day one. Brockers has the raw material, but it may take him a bit longer to make his mark.

[Jesse]

While I would like him, I think we already have Brockers in Edwards.

[ClarkCam]

I just realized this was in the "NFL draft" forum... I apologize. You could even delete this, admin.

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

Brockers has a huge upside and great athleticism, but he didn't flash "I'm a top 10 pick" ability this year; at least in my opinion.

[Snake]

Cox is more polished and prob more well rounded at this point. Both could be great players.

[DawgzLife]

I see this as potential (athletic skills) vs. production.

I've watched all of the available tape on Brockers the combine, but also watched many games of LSU the past year. People talk about him taking up 2 blockers & suffing the run, but Cox had more tackles, as well as more sacks (even in a game less). Brockers was often single man blocked.

Brockers: 23 tkls & 2 sacks in 13 games

Cox: 26 tkls & 5 sacks in 12 games

[carolina-chuck]

Worthy!

[BeasonBeastingBacks]

we should draft both of them

fug a secondary

[DawgzLife]

Worthy!

Worthy is a great player, but certainly not for a #9 1st round pick.

[DawgzLife]

we should draft both of them

fug a secondary

:lol: I feel that way sometimes too, but go back & watch the NO game & see how bad we need secondary. I think we need 1 DT & in the second we need to get a player who is a CB/LB & DE. I hate that we don't have a 3rd rounder, b/c there will impact players there too.