Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Melvin Ingram May Be The Best Pick At De And Lb For The Panthers


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of the things overlooked with Ingram is that not only was he a great pass rusher but he started out at linebacker his freshman year. He moved to DE in 2009. Lets say we want a pass rusher and someone who can drop into space in a zone blitz. A guy who can cover a TE although maybe not a running back. A guy who can come in on 3-4 looks and play the DE position as well as the DE in a 4-3 base offense.

He might give us good versatility doing all those things. He could play some Sam backer who ends up blitzing 50% of the time in our scheme, would be stout against the run and could surely hold the edge. If Davis surprises everyone and comes back strong he would still see the field as a pass rusher. Instead of looking at who would replace Davis we need to think about who could come in and be versatile enough to fill that role if needed and would still be solid if he played as a DE. He runs a 4.79 40 which is about what Beason will run this year if he is lucky. After all Beason's 40 time coming out of college was a 4.72.

Given we run a hybrid defense and will incorporate both schemes and here is a guy who plays DE in a 4-3, or a OLB in a 3-4 and maybe even Sam linebacker in a 4-3, he could fit quite a few needs if we can think outside of the box.

Throwing it out there for consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is ideal for a 3-4 team at OLB. His arms are too short to get off blocks consistently against OTs so I don't think we consider him at DE. I love him as a player and his versatility, but don't think he is a scheme fit. Not to mention, we have not brought him in for a pre-draft visit. We have never drafted a player in the 1st round that we did not bring in for a visit. Quoted Mixon on that. I'd be incredibly surprised if we drafted him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is ideal for a 3-4 team at OLB. His arms are too short to get off blocks consistently against OTs so I don't think we consider him at DE. I love him as a player and his versatility, but don't think he is a scheme fit. Not to mention, we have not brought him in for a pre-draft visit. We have never drafted a player in the 1st round that we did not bring in for a visit. Quoted Mixon on that. I'd be incredibly surprised if we drafted him.

What people say is that he has excellent explosiveness, strong hands and good moves which allows him to penetrate between blockers and make tackles. His arm length issue is overblown because he won't be engaging offensive linemen straight up but splitting gaps and going around the edge. As for never drafting a player we didn't bring in, I don't remember bringing in Beason, Davis, Williams or Stewart. I know at least 2 of those guys we didn't bring in. Like usual Mixon seems out in left field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the not fitting our scheme but honestly what exactly is our scheme these days. Didn't we bring in Applewhite and Dillard to do the exact same thing. For those who think we play a standard 4-3 it doesn't look like a fit, but for folks who see us as evolving and needing versatility, this move could be excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are switching to the 3-4, then I would be all for Ingram. I think Ingram would not be very effective in the NFL at base 4-3 DE. As far as I know, we are still a base 4-3 team, that will show some more 3-4 looks. A guy like that can play both 3-tech and 5-tech would be a good pick. Ingram would have a hard time disengaging from blockers on running plays with his 31 inch arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Utilization is everything with this kid. At best he can be a Terrell Suggs type of player, at worst he could be misused and bounce around the league his whole career. He can't line up in the same position all game, every game, he has to be lined up each game based on mismatches, and even then he needs to be moved around, because he will be keyed on. He'll be assigned a position on the roster, but he can't be used that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are switching to the 3-4, then I would be all for Ingram. I think Ingram would not be very effective in the NFL at base 4-3 DE. As far as I know, we are still a base 4-3 team, that will show some more 3-4 looks. A guy like that can play both 3-tech and 5-tech would be a good pick. Ingram would have a hard time disengaging from blockers on running plays with his 31 inch arms.

Again his draft analysis doesn't say that he had any problem against the run. They said we was solid in the run game could hold the edge and is a good tackler. This analysis says he had 3 of his sacks at the 3 technique spot which may give him an edge against slower guards.

Run defense: Uses low center of gravity and thick upper body to play with leverage against the run game. Holds his ground well whether lined up with his hand down or standing up. Can split double team to penetrate and make the tackle. Often spins off to reach ballcarriers running to either side instead of shock-and-shed on the edge. Most tight ends will not handle him one-on-one.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1620606

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...