Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Is Going To Become Of Nasa? What Purpose Do They Serve?


Iceberg Slim

Recommended Posts

Since NASA has retired all of the space shuttles and we now need a ride from the Chinese or Russians to get into space, what purpose do they really serve. It seems for years, until the development of the space shuttle we (humans) were trying to reach into the stars, to go further. Somewhere along the way, we lost sight and thought it was cool to orbit the earth, and just go around in a big ass cirlce. I know when the Mars flight landed and we were actually able to control the rover, I felt a sense of hope that things were going to move forward again, but sadly that is not the case. So I ask, what is the purpose of NASA, can we just dismantle it and use the funding to reduce the deficit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, ,most of NASA's current projects are not exploratory projects. To that point most of them are looking at the earth, not really looking outward. Take a look at the link if you don't believe me.....http://www.nasa.gov/missions/current/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a really interesting news segment about government funded NASA vs. private sector space exploration. It talked about how if the government wasn't running the show, we would be so much further along with private businesses building and developing technology. I would link the video if I knew how/where to find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a really interesting news segment about government funded NASA vs. private sector space exploration. It talked about how if the government wasn't running the show, we would be so much further along with private businesses building and developing technology. I would link the video if I knew how/where to find it.

See this I agree with, NASA has an overbloated budget with no true mission. They allow the private sector to captor just a portion of those funds for development, we will have some serious progress....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, ,most of NASA's current projects are not exploratory projects. To that point most of them are looking at the earth, not really looking outward. Take a look at the link if you don't believe me.....http://www.nasa.gov/missions/current/index.html

They are still space based missions.

But fwiw, NASA is working on several exploratory missions right now, including exploring Mars, deep space, the outer planets and the Asteroid belt. They are also planning launches for several observation satellite and telescope launches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a really interesting news segment about government funded NASA vs. private sector space exploration. It talked about how if the government wasn't running the show, we would be so much further along with private businesses building and developing technology. I would link the video if I knew how/where to find it.

In commercial aspects perhaps, but not necessarily in exploration. For the most part, the private sector is concerned about making money, not in exploration or furthering science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this I agree with, NASA has an overbloated budget with no true mission. They allow the private sector to captor just a portion of those funds for development, we will have some serious progress....

Can be said about pretty much all government programs and departments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this I agree with, NASA has an overbloated budget with no true mission. They allow the private sector to captor just a portion of those funds for development, we will have some serious progress....

That is a mere fraction of what it should be. Doubling NASAs budget form 18.7 billion to 37 billion it would be a vastly better way to spend the money than a whole slew of bureaucratic morasses they throw money into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...