Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox/Hurney's Tenure for the Panthers


bleys

Recommended Posts

i am a pragmatic business man. you set your contracts up with anticipations that certain benchmarks will be met. you have a goal in mind and you allow in your contracts enough reasonable time to accomplish those goals. if you think they are close and near the end of the contract, you extend it. if they haven't reached those goals and they you have provided them with the tools they said they needed to accomplish it then something is wrong. you have to set a limit on how much time and money you will invest in someone. if they aren't getting the results, replace them with someone that can.

you shouldn't beat a dead horse and you shouldn't keep paying someone who can't seem to get the job done. the job is building a consistently winning team that is a legit superbowl contender. 8 years is plenty of time to see what he can do. this is the last chance.

i realy like fox. but i do agree with this. if he cant get us into the playoffs this year. i change may be whats needed to get us over the top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans can be rather fickle sometimes.

With John Fox, the Panthers took the approach that it's better to grow their own star coach than to tab somebody else's. With quarterback, the coach they chose took the opposite approach, deciding to take a guy someone else developed rather than develop someone on their own (a process they feel takes too long).

Fans, on the flipside, always want a shiny new toy at quarterback. But when it comes to the coach, they'd rather put their trust in a guy who was already a star somewhere else (like Cowher).

No wonder there's a disconnect :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldn't say wanting a change after 8 or 9 years is exactly being fickle if things aren't as good at the end of that time frame as they should/could be.

at some point a line has to be drawn. where do you draw that line? what is an appropriate time-frame to decide if a coach is going to be able to take you to the top or make you a consistently good team with a winning record most years? imo, as it has always been, this year is the year to show us what he can do. he has the players, he has the coaches. what is he going to do with it. if he can show that he has the right ingredients and can mix them in the right way to give us another big year then he should have an extension at the end of the year. if he can't get the right mix and lead us to that big year then we should just not give him another contract.

winning season + playoffs win(s) = good extension

winning season but no playoffs or one and done = one year contract

under .500 = no new contract

btw...not looking for him to fail. i'm looking for him to succeed and think he has most of the tools necessary to do it and think he feels he has all the tools needed. i believe he will do it but i want to be ready to move if he doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Fox has been and is a good coach. Yes, I think that He and his coaching staff should work on adapting to situations; but I can say that because I am a fan and don't know or understand everything that is going on. I like his style and don't see that many different Realistic options for a HC change in Carolina.

Just looking at his stats tells you that he is a good coach. (i'm not saying great)

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/FoxxJo0.htm

I still think this last playoff loss is to fresh in many of our minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that they are loyal. But sometimes that can hurt a team more than it will help. I hope they have learned from that and know when to cut'em and when to keep'em. I'm not bringing Jake into it (oooppss :D) cuz that comes back to the question of who are you going to get to replace him? A question no one has really offered a good answer to, so don't try now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Fox loses control of this team like Capers and Seifert did then he will be replaced. We can speculate when he will be replaced but as long as He fights, stay competitive and runs a good team. I don't see JR making changes and starting over. Everyone seems to think that if he doesn't "take the next step" he'll be gone. Fox goes when the team quits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldn't say wanting a change after 8 or 9 years is exactly being fickle if things aren't as good at the end of that time frame as they should/could be.

at some point a line has to be drawn. where do you draw that line? what is an appropriate time-frame to decide if a coach is going to be able to take you to the top or make you a consistently good team with a winning record most years? imo, as it has always been, this year is the year to show us what he can do. he has the players, he has the coaches. what is he going to do with it. if he can show that he has the right ingredients and can mix them in the right way to give us another big year then he should have an extension at the end of the year. if he can't get the right mix and lead us to that big year then we should just not give him another contract.

winning season + playoffs win(s) = good extension

winning season but no playoffs or one and done = one year contract

under .500 = no new contract

btw...not looking for him to fail. i'm looking for him to succeed and think he has most of the tools necessary to do it and think he feels he has all the tools needed. i believe he will do it but i want to be ready to move if he doesn't.

Fickle wasn't the best word for what I was trying to say, honestly :lol:

As to the line, Cowher went 15 years. And how long has Jeff Fisher been coaching?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that they are loyal. But sometimes that can hurt a team more than it will help. I hope they have learned from that and know when to cut'em and when to keep'em. I'm not bringing Jake into it (oooppss :D) cuz that comes back to the question of who are you going to get to replace him? A question no one has really offered a good answer to, so don't try now.
i'd like to see how meeks does this year.

there are a few others but with the coaching staff in place being so new i would be surprised if they did a whole restructuring and either just replaced the head with someone new who could fit in with the rest of the staff or promoted from within.

i'm not anticipating any of this happening but if it does, this is very much something that could happen. davidson and even skipper are people who might be considered. there is always some of the older coaches that would be available (cowher, schotty, herm j/k) and there are also new guns that have been getting the nod as of late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fickle wasn't the best word for what I was trying to say, honestly :lol:

As to the line, Cowher went 15 years. And how long has Jeff Fisher been coaching?

well, cowher had a whole lot more winning seasons than fox has. cowher only had 4 .500 or worse seasons in 15 years which is what fox has had in 7 so i can understand sticking with cowher a whole lot more.

fisher...that is an odd one that has probably had his job for longer than i would have him for. 6 winning seasons out of 15 (of course they went to the playoffs every winning season that they had). they haven't had any sustained success. they will have two winning seasons surrounded by several seasons of mediocrity or worse. at what point do you look at his body of work and decide that he just isn't going to get it done? after 5 more years? 10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...