Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Multiple dead in TDKR showing


Recommended Posts

We should just give people rocket launchers. So what if it'll help kill massive amounts of people. Without them, people would still stab each other with knives even though the number of people getting stabbed would be much lower!

The outrage people are experiencing today would still exist if a guy took a butcher knife and randomly killed an innocent person.....and it made the full news cycle with details.

People will always find means to act out in violence....and I have yet to hear you give a suggestion to go WITH gun restrictions to tackle the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you want a gun it should be a muzzleloader.

Go kill 20 people with a musket. I mean that is the gun that was around in 1776....not an AR-15

RIGHTZ TO BEARS ARM!!!!!

this is an intriguing point. i've never given real pause to the technological context of the right to bear arms. i wonder how the founding fathers would've decided on such an issue if arms had the capability to kill scores (or hundreds [or thousands]) of people in moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is an intriguing point. i've never given real pause to the technological context of the right to bear arms. i wonder how the founding fathers would've decided on such an issue if arms had the capability to kill scores (or hundreds [or thousands]) of people in moments.

Every once in a while I stumble onto one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he didn't burn it down.

Gun was just his selected method....point clearly was he was choosing to act out in violence.

As another poster pointed out, taking away guns would decrease emotional and unplanned moments of violence bc of the ease of use.....as far as the crazy planners go....it just makes them less efficient.

Which is why the anti gun crowd needs more to there argument....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is an intriguing point. i've never given real pause to the technological context of the right to bear arms. i wonder how the founding fathers would've decided on such an issue if arms had the capability to kill scores (or hundreds [or thousands]) of people in moments.

Right to bear arms doesn't include WMDs and missiles....people don't have the right to such things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gun was just his selected method....point clearly was he was choosing to act out in violence.

As another poster pointed out, taking away guns would decrease emotional and unplanned moments of violence bc of the ease of use.....as far as the crazy planners go....it just makes them less efficient.

Which is why the anti gun crowd needs more to there argument....

Show me a place where there is stricter gun laws but higher incidents of Arson than the united states.

Clearly there has to be a correlation and can be proven

But there isn't. Homicides happen at an equal amount when you remove guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not to sure it's a solid argument to try to estimate what he will do this season, BUT he's had a solid 3 years in the league. Here's his numbers compared to Jewell's for the same time period. I can see the logic of getting a starting MLB for a (at best) WR4. AT, XL and Tmac are certainly our top 3 guys IN 2025. Certainly worth pondering.
    • Training camp just started and it's already starting... https://www.facebook.com/reel/24277303321904901/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v LOL No one believes you and you have fan pages sharing this with a "Play him or trade him" headline. Oh wee mayne. This is why no front offices wanted any part of this.
    • Honestly, it only makes sense if you're trying to chase being the best bad team you can be this year. The number one question we need answered this season is whether or not Bryce is our long-term franchise QB. Trading away a second year WR who was second on the team in catch percentage, first in yards per target, and who clearly outplayed your 1st round pick for a likely one year rental fill in LB is exactly the type of short sighted desperation moves that has made us the worst franchise in the league under Tepper. We gotta stop making these types of moves and just focus on building a good organization and a good roster. Lloyd is a JAG LB another bad team and awful defense is wavering on and a couple of Panthers fans are salivating over him. Oof. We just need to be patient and wait. Definitely make some calls around the league to teams deep at LB and see if there's an opportunity to add one for a late round pick. Definitely shop the waiver wire hard. The reality is that LB is almost certainly going to be a weakness for us this year. We weren't fixing our entire roster in one off-season and we're not fixing an overall weak positional group in late July.  If you trade for Lloyd LB is still a weakness and you've given up a young promising WR who could potentially help you answer the question of whether or not Bryce is that guy. That's bad football business.
×
×
  • Create New...