Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Alexander/Thomas Keiser > Greg Hardy


Guest Bwood

Recommended Posts

Yeah, he has comparable hurries.....yet not even in the ballpark of those guys when it comes to making the play.

A hurry can be a TD for the opponent. That stat doesn't wow like some.

Youre right, Hardy isn't like those guys, mainly because he's still developing as a player. But damn its hard for me to not be impressed by something like that when he's going into his fourth year and the rest of those guys are seasoned vets. And good job implying that Hardy doing his job lets the other team score, thats on the DBs, not him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Youre right, Hardy isn't like those guys, mainly because he's still developing as a player. But damn its hard for me to not be impressed by something like that when he's going into his fourth year and the rest of those guys are seasoned vets. And good job implying that Hardy doing his job lets the other team score, thats on the DBs, not him

Not implying he let's them score.....just that hurries don't carry the same weight as other stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who thinks that because Keiser got 3.5 sacks in garbage time of preseason games, that hes better than Hardy is an idiot.

What about those that acknowledge he matched his sack production in real games in 2011 in a fraction of snaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about those that acknowledge he matched his sack production in real games in 2011 in a fraction of snaps?

The only problem is, nobody has seen every snap, every pass vs. every run, counted double teams, chips etc. so to say, based on sack ratio that Keiser is better is silly. Thats all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure. But at the same time, he is nowhere near where Hardy is.

Nowhere near LOL? Please tell me when Hardy has shown anything to prove he's on another level than Keiser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem is, nobody has seen every snap, every pass vs. every run, counted double teams, chips etc. so to say, based on sack ratio that Keiser is better is silly. Thats all.

Without going back and watching...I think it is safe to say neither Hardy or Kieser saw many double teams.

Also safe to say Kieser saw a fraction of the passing down snaps Hardy did...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...