Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Big Of A Disadvantage Is It To Play A 'New' Head Coach In The Season Opener?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

You are taking it out of context.

Going into last season Smith was a bust. Its why SF drafted a quarterback. Freeman on the other hand is a player on the rise. San frans offense consisted of Gore/Davis. Greg Schiano has much better talent on offense in his 1st season then Harbaugh did in his. Lol why do you think the 9ners went out and signed/up-graded their offense this season?

I wouldn't be so sure about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i'm not a big fan but i think he's better than Smith when when Harbaugh took over.

Talk about comparing apples to oranges. Harbaugh had a FAR better resume not only as a coach in college, but as a QB guy.

Schiano had one good season as a college HC and is a defense guy. Tell me how comparing those two situation lends any merit to your arguement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about comparing apples to oranges. Harbaugh had a FAR better resume not only as a coach in college, but as a QB guy.

Schiano had one good season as a college HC and is a defense guy. Tell me how comparing those two situation lends any merit to your arguement.

E-z, all i said was Tampa has better offensive weapons in Schiano's 1st season than Harbaugh did in his.

I believe Schiano walked into a batter situation with Freeman than Harbaugh did with Smith. Its why Harbaugh drafted Kaepernick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

E-z, all i said was Tampa has better offensive weapons in Schiano's 1st season than Harbaugh did in his.

I believe Schiano walked into a batter situation with Freeman than Harbaugh did with Smith. Its why Harbaugh drafted Kaepernick.

Schiano may have better weapons on offense, but I don't know how big of a gap is between Freeman and Smith given what Smith had to endure.

Also, Harbaugh coaches in a weak division, he can get by with less on offense, especially with that defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...