Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's first interception


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

So is it just me that thinks that that is the kind of throw you WANT your franchise QB to be able to make?

To find the opening in double and sometimes even TRIPLE coverage in order to get a critical completion downfield?

Because that would have been a completed pass without the (uncalled) pass interference with the defender climbing Lafell like a ladder.

When guys like Manning or Brady or Rodgers or (in the day) Favre make throws like that, people nod and say "yep, that's just what they do". I can't believe there are some fans that think that Cam shouldn't have thrown that pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone found major fault in Cam's 1st INT. Its the 2nd one that was bad.

Well, I can't disagree with you there.

But I've read plenty of disagreement, here and on other forums with Cam's first int.... most commonly "Cam's got to learn NOT to throw it into double coverage!"

Which drives me crazy, because the BEST quarterbacks often find the seam in double coverage and make the throw for a big play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see what was so bad about Cam's 2nd interception either. It was 3rd and long and we needed a conversion. There's a good chance no one else was open, so he just threw it up for grabs deep to Smitty. Not that bad of a decision on my view (again, assuming no one else was open). God knows Delhomme got a lot of completions that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that was the ONLY option, yea considering all things it was a good throw. But if that was his primary, then it was just a flat out terrrible read.

Again the open question: is it a terrible read to throw to the primary that is "covered" but a seam exists to make the completion and you throw the ball right down that seam?

Don't the franchise QBs in this league do that all the time? Or are you saying franchise QBs always check down when the primary is double-covered because they know they can't make the throw?

Sounds like Jimmy Clausen may have a future in this league after all. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet the pass was spot on and, without the uncalled interference, would have been a completion.

So I guess Cam beat the odds.

No, it was intercepted. It doesn't matter that you feel like there was interference. Sometimes throwing a pass is about risk management and the risk on that pass was very high. One of the risks was a missed interference call by replacement refs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again the open question: is it a terrible read to throw to the primary that is "covered" but a seam exists to make the completion and you throw the ball right down that seam?

Don't the franchise QBs in this league do that all the time? Or are you saying franchise QBs always check down when the primary is double-covered because they know they can't make the throw?

Sounds like Jimmy Clausen may have a future in this league after all. :P

There are different degrees of "covered". On the first interception there was at least 3, maybe 4 or 5 guys that swarmed to the ball for the tip. Throwing to a guy "covered" by one or even two guys isn't so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see what was so bad about Cam's 2nd interception either. It was 3rd and long and we needed a conversion. There's a good chance no one else was open, so he just threw it up for grabs deep to Smitty. Not that bad of a decision on my view (again, assuming no one else was open). God knows Delhomme got a lot of completions that way.

that was just as good as a punt, imo....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...