Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So This Guy Jumps In With a Tiger @ Bronx Zoo...


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

Guy makes a conscious decision to jump from the train into the tiger's den at the zoo. Get some of these lines:

"...I wanted to be one with the tiger..."

"...despite his serious injuries, he was able to pet the tiger before zookeepers came to his rescue..."

"...his leap was definitely not a suicide attempt, but a desire to be one with the tiger..."

Being "one with the tiger" does not mean "being course #1 for the tiger."

Least the tiger could have done was rip this guy's 'nads off so he won't be allowed to pollute the population of mankind with any offspring for the rest of his life.

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-09-22-Bronx%20Zoo-Tiger%20Mauling/id-175c8806442141eca5904e21da7a55ba

Link to comment
Share on other sites

glad to hear they didn't do anything to the tiger. Always pisses me off when you hear stories of hikers or campers in the back country that get attacked by cougars or bears or whatever and then they gather up a posse of people and kill the animal...you know...like it was the animal's fault

Link to comment
Share on other sites

glad to hear they didn't do anything to the tiger. Always pisses me off when you hear stories of hikers or campers in the back country that get attacked by cougars or bears or whatever and then they gather up a posse of people and kill the animal...you know...like it was the animal's fault

There is a very good reason they do this. Humans aren't natural prey for these animals. Well cougars will stalk about anything, but Bears and Wolves will generally avoid humans. However, if you get an animal that attacks and eats a human, then the fear is that animal will become accustomed to humans as prey, and start stalking them. Not just in the wild, but near houses and towns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a very good reason they do this. Humans aren't natural prey for these animals. Well cougars will stalk about anything, but Bears and Wolves will generally avoid humans. However, if you get an animal that attacks and eats a human, then the fear is that animal will become accustomed to humans as prey, and start stalking them. Not just in the wild, but near houses and towns.

That's because they were here first and once the humans encroach upon their habitat, they must adapt to a new and different intruder. And, obviously as we all know, humans have the ability to reason and rationalize. Therefore their excuses for hunting down and killing an animal for protecting its own habitat are justified in the minds if some.

You'll recall we did the same thing to the native Americans, except instead of hunting them down and killing all of them, we herded the remaining few into "reservations."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because they were here first and once the humans encroach upon their habitat, they must adapt to a new and different intruder. And, obviously as we all know, humans have the ability to reason and rationalize. Therefore their excuses for hunting down and killing an animal for protecting its own habitat are justified in the minds if some.

You'll recall we did the same thing to the native Americans, except instead of hunting them down and killing all of them, we herded the remaining few into "reservations."

That is not always true. Generally, when a bear or wolf attacks and eats a human, its because the animal is no longer able to go after its natural prey, usually due to age. Humans are easier to catch and kill than something like an elk or a deer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is not always true. Generally, when a bear or wolf attacks and eats a human, its because the animal is no longer able to go after its natural prey, usually due to age. Humans are easier to catch and kill than something like an elk or a deer.

Aren't you assuming the attack is based upon sustenance? I'm thinking it's more about territory and protection of that territory. Hadn't even considered the aspect of food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't you assuming the attack is based upon sustenance? I'm thinking it's more about territory and protection of that territory. Hadn't even considered the aspect of food.

Yeah its mostly the food thing. The territory attacks are really rare. They had a news story a few years back about a couple hippies in Ca walking into a den of wolf pups and Not getting attacked. The pack was just focused on getting the pups the hell out of the area. That said anybody that scews with bear cubs knows what to expect.

Side note I can condense this news report:

Cincinnati scored a touchdown after the patriots fumbled the ball but were stopped by an unsportsman like conduct flag. They had to settle for a fieldgoal instead of a Touchdown. The Bengals Fans were very upset and are appealing the decison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't you assuming the attack is based upon sustenance? I'm thinking it's more about territory and protection of that territory. Hadn't even considered the aspect of food.

Sorry, I was out in Yellowstone recently, and the Park Rangers were talking about Bears and Wolves and that is what I was thinking of. They only go after the animals if they consumed a human or if the animal went after humans because it saw them as a food source. Incidental attacks are different. If its just a wrong place wrong time (for example a human comes between a mother and her cubs), they leave the animal alone, because its just doing what comes natural. But if they feel that the Bears start equating humans with food, they always go after it because they learned in the past thats a big problem.

One of the interesting things they discussed is how the number of Bear attacks in Yellowstone dropped dramatically once they strictly forbid humans from feeding the bears. Encroaching on their territory was less of an issue than leaving one's garbage can open. Once the Bears stopped seeing humans as a easy food source, they started going after more natural food sources, ie elk, deer, fish etc... If you get caught feeding a animal in Yellowstone, you get a $2000 fine. And if an animal is looking for food from humans, the animal gets put down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...