Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Cam Newton rant.

FirstRoundPick

By FirstRoundPick,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

FirstRoundPick Newbie

FirstRoundPick

Posted
Posted

Cam does not play defense which is the real reason we lost and will continue to lose. Cam was pretty much carrying the offense himself and was the main reason we were in the game. Cams own man helped knocked the ball out not that it matters because Cam has to play perfect with this shitty defense, and he wasn't perfect yesterday.

Blame the defense.

Oh look Micheal Turner is back to his normal self. I wonder why?

Here is visual evidence of their ineptitude all day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCjDtwFROrM

Blame McDermott

After giving up the huge play, you have to know they will use the flats and sidelines to stop the clock. Giving up those two other plays is just plain dumb.

Blame Rivera

The overwhelmed comatose statue, cant trust Newton, Stewart and Tolbert to get us an inch. What is Hurney giving them so much money for? Nevermind. Pinning them on the one yard line wasn't a sure thing and was about 3 inches away from being a touchback. Twenty yard line would have been a disaster, one yard line gave us a good chance, but not as good as getting an inch with Cam Newton as your QB.

Blame Nakamura

Jesus Christ! Even the sugar coaters blame him. Norman did his part on the the long bomb to White. Hard to tell if Norman was bad yesterday or if Naka just kept screwing up.

Blame Captain

That PI was horrendous as long as you dont let Jones get any YAC, and definitely not to the sideline, and that would have been great.

Dont blame the player who played best on our team. This loss is not on Cam. Without him, we get blown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
goodoleboy Newbie

goodoleboy

Posted
Posted

Everyone likes to say we wouldn't have been in the game without Cam. Thats true but we also wouldn't have been in the game without Nakamura's interception in the end zone in the first quarter or the 7 sacks the Defense turned in You win as a team and you lose as a team. Plays made in the first half count the same as those made at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FirstRoundPick Newbie

FirstRoundPick

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Everyone likes to say we wouldn't have been in the game without Cam. Thats true but we also wouldn't have been in the game without Nakamura's interception in the end zone in the first quarter or the 7 sacks the Defense turned in You win as a team and you lose as a team. Plays made in the first half count the same as those made at the end.

Defense was bad all game. Mostly the secondary. You could have put Colin Branch or Deke Cooper in over Naka and I think we would have won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted

Everyone likes to say we wouldn't have been in the game without Cam. Thats true but we also wouldn't have been in the game without Nakamura's interception in the end zone in the first quarter or the 7 sacks the Defense turned in You win as a team and you lose as a team. Plays made in the first half count the same as those made at the end.

I'm pretty sure we would have been in the game without nakamuras interception, but not without the pressure the dl was bringing all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...