Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Charlotte ever going to get the chance to host a Super Bowl


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

Hotel space, not to mention the fact that Charlotte generally sucks. Raleigh ftw.

I would love to have the resources to bring a team to Raleigh... Based on the size it's expected to expand in the upcoming years and the way they rally around the Canes (they even raise hell during the game, WHAT? lol), I think it would be a great place to bring a franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hotel space, not to mention the fact that Charlotte generally sucks. Raleigh ftw.

Raleigh...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Get back to me when you become an actual city, champ.

That said, the weather will keep the Super Bowl out of most teams' stadiums. I heard some rumblings to change that, but I don't see it ever happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way, because on the barely-in-the-realm-of-possibility chance that the Saints ever make it to the big game, they can't risk a gust of wind or a chill in the air throwing off Brees and their passing game. The Super Bowl will be played in a dome or on the equator for the rest of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny that Jerry Richardson originally planned a stadium about 15,000 smaller and was convinced that he needed to upgrade in order to have a shot at a Super Bowl and still doesn't have a shot...

Of course he sells it out anyway, so it's a win/win...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
    • Got home in time to see Halls goal in the 3rd. Saw replays of Staal and LeCuck dropping gloves on the faceoff loved that! Playoff Freddie entered the building  woo! Hope to see the full replay on Fandual.
×
×
  • Create New...