Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can't defend Cam no more


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Cam's record is 7-14.

This team has had the ball at the end of the games over and over (needing either one score or a few 1st downs to ice the game). In every instance, they have come up short.

Watch the late game performance....Cam has been wilting under the pressure. He has the mental toughness right now of an over easy egg.

He's no Jake Delhome thats for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not everyone.

It's just funny how our expectations were through the roof before the season started and now we've made a complete 180.

Obviously he hasn't been anywhere close to the CAM of last year, but this is the same guy. We know he has it. Give him time, whatever it is he's doing wrong, he'll fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is garbage. It looked like we had three plays on Sunday. When Cam ran an NFL offense last season, he looked good and broke all the rookie records. Now that he is running a predictable college offense, he is struggling. Everyone wants to jump on him like they do not see the inept play-calling and line play. You think that a QB that big keeps fumbling unless he is getting killed in the pocket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam had a bad game but I don't understand anyone saying he's a choke artist or outright sucks. Look at Eli Manning and Drew Brees' second years.

Honestly I think that pass in the endzone slipped out of his hands or he just otherwise had a bad release. It was raining after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same people stumbling over themselves to pile on Cam are the same ones anxiously hoping they were right about not wanting him drafted under any circumstances in the first place. Anything to say I told you so I guess.

Not everyone in this fanbase deserves a successful team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, then don't... doesn't matter to him either way.

He's gonna do what he's gonna do, doesn't matter how you think or feel about it.

I guess Cam is the first QB to ever miss an open receiver while on the run, throwing across his body. I'm not making excuses for him, but it's not as if that was an easy throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck and RGIII have made an immediate impact....because their TEAMs are more complete....

And they have better coaches..IMHO

What are you talking about? Where are the Colts more complete? They are a complete mess, more or less...

The Redskins are not that much better, Shanahan didn't do poo the last 2 seasons. RGIII was his last shot.

Luck and RGIII are real QBs, Newton isn't...perhaps he will be one day.

Rivera should stay but Chud shold be fired instead. Your offense is good enough to perform well consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No actually you don't got it. I was replying nonsense to a post that was complete nonsense.

No I get it....you claim to have something revelational to say, but you are not going to say it because the intital post was lacking.

Claim to have something good to say.....say it brother. We are all waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...