Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Position


Zod

Recommended Posts

Anyone else feel that draft position should be thrown out of a payer's bio after the first or second year in the NFL?

Seems like it never works out to the team benefit.

If a first round player is playing well, it's expected and rarely mentioned. He is just a solid player.

If a later round or undrafted player is playing well, it's always mentioned... Yeah but he wasn't drafted we can't count on him really.

If a first round player is a bust, he is kept around far too long "you can't cut him, he was a first rounder and may come around eventually"

Once the player has started on this team for a season, draft position is no longer relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

absolutely and after a couple years i don't care how he was acquired. the only thing that matters is that he was.

it actually doesn't really bother me if, say, a DT that was drafted in the 3rd round gets put behind a DT that was a UDFA as long as we got someone solid to do the job.

sure, it sucks that an early draft pick was more or less wasted, but i would rather us start someone with a later draft position because he happened to be better than the guy we selected earlier than starting a guy just because of when he was drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...