Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC Playbook: Broncos vs Panthers


CarolinaVeins

Recommended Posts

Start the Panthers D in fantasy football.

I say at least 6 sacks.

Lol not a chance. Peyton is the best protected QB in the league now that the line has gelled. Not to mention the RBs are all proficient pass protectors. Our two starting OTs have given up a combined 2 sacks this year, and none in the last three games. The Panthers will be lucky if they get one coverage sack. The Broncos, on the other hand, are a shoe in for 3+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol not a chance. Peyton is the best protected QB in the league now that the line has gelled. Not to mention the RBs are all proficient pass protectors. Our two starting OTs have given up a combined 2 sacks this year, and none in the last three games. The Panthers will be lucky if they get one coverage sack. The Broncos, on the other hand, are a shoe in for 3+.

Hahaha, oh young one... You must have missed this thread?

Denver is #1 allowed in sacks and hits on the QB, we're tied for 4th in sacks. Charles Big Money Johnson had 3 sacks on arguably one of the best offensive linemen in the league Tyson Clabo.

Way to underestimate your team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha, oh young one... You must have missed this thread?

Denver is #1 allowed in sacks and hits on the QB, we're tied for 4th in sacks. Charles Big Money Johnson had 3 sacks on arguably one of the best offensive linemen in the league Tyson Clabo.

Way to underestimate your team.

Yeah, Denver allows the LEAST amount of sacks and hits. I think we still get to him, but it want be easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely pulled a TCF on this one and failed to read the article lol.

I stand by my 6 sacks though I love our defensive line for the first time in a long while.

TCF can you remind us, do you lye down? Or lay down? Or do you lye something down? Or lay something down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely pulled a TCF on this one and failed to read the article lol.

I stand by my 6 sacks though I love our defensive line for the first time in a long while.

TCF can you remind us, do you lye down? Or lay down? Or do you lye something down? Or lay something down?

Yeah I definitely miss remembered that... And swore to it as well. I was wrong and admitted as much. A real man can admit when he's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For me, no issue going WR - as long as he can tackle when we move him to MLB
    • He was pretty highly touted that year by all the draftniks. But he's one of those small school guys who you do have to pay attention to his workout numbers since he was playing against lower level competition. All his draft hype was about his great athleticism and potential, then he went to the Combine and posted very pedestrian measurable. 5.33 40 time, 29.5" vertical, 26 reps on the bench. Overall he had the 19th ranked athleticism score among DTs that year. No one would've been complaining in hindsight about drafting a DT had we drafted Chris Jones who was picked 8 spots after we drafted Butler.
    • We have one of the best young WR duos in the league with TMac and Coker. Could use a solid vet #3 option, but that's not terribly hard to find. You could make the argument that every other part of the roster needs long term upgrades before WR. OT - Icky injured, Moton aging, big question mark moving forward here Interior OLine - OG is great but center position is a big question mark, with injuries stacking up on Corbett and BC, and Mays being a free agent  (could definitely change though if we re-sign Mays) RB - Dowdle most certainly gone, not suggesting spending a 1st on RB but still, need a replacement here TE - Meh overall, basically have three guys who are backup #2 level TEs, could use a top end starter QB - lol LBer - horrible group, definitely needs upgrades Secondary - Mike Jackson could be playing himself out of our price range and 100% could use a new FS Edge - Scourton looks promising long term but need more here in this unit, obvious weak spot DT - Brown is a beast, but outside of him very thin   WR is the ONE position on the entire roster where we're actually looking great moving forward lol TLDR --> this mock is retarded
×
×
  • Create New...