Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blazers want Felton?


Black

Recommended Posts

Sources say Charlotte remains highly confident that it can follow up the Richardson deal by finding a taker for versatile swingman Gerald Wallace, despite the prospect of three seasons at $9.5 million each left on Wallace's contract beyond this season. It's believed that teams interested in trying to pry Raymond Felton away from the Bobcats instead of Wallace -- Portland has been mentioned -- have to be willing to take back mothballed center Nazr Mohammed (owed a combined $13.4 million in 2009-2010 and 2010-11) thanks to Felton's improvement since being moved to shooting guard alongside rookie point guard D.J. Augustin. One source close to the situation said that new Bobcats coach Larry Brown had already been grinding on vets such as Richardson and Wallace, which has apparently fed into Brown's famed penchant for wanting to make changes.

not sure who we would get from Portland, but it would be nice to dump Nazr

honestly, i think i like the overhaul idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Portland is LOADED with young talent. There is no way we would get ripped off if we could make a deal so ship Nazzi and Felton out there. The guys I'm guessing Portland wants to ship out are: Przybilla,Fernandez,Outlaw,Blake,Frye and Webster. Przybilla and Fernandez/Blake for Felton and Nazzi seems like a steal to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aldridge would be amazing! he has really turned into a scorer. id be willing to throw in anybody except DJ to get aldridge.

i wonder if they would do something like okafor and felton for aldridge and pryzbilla. that would be amazing!

that would give us great size.

PG- DJ, singletary

SG -carrol, shannon brown(i like brown better than carrol, i just like the lineup better with him in second string. carrol an morrison cant play on the same line)

SF -wallace, morrison

PF- Diaw, ajinca, hollins

C- Aldridge, pryzbilla, juwan howard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats whats im thinkin, what would you trade gerald for? another SF? im satisfied with our bigs for now, we dont need a starter, just a solid role player who can score some. why trade wallace, who is a solid 3, for another 3? and PG is fine with felton and DJ. a SG? if you do that, where does carrol and morrison and brown play? the 3? haha

keep wallace, he is still improving his game. he really has gotten better at Free throws and his "set" jump shot. id trade felton if a deal came along for a starting quality sg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats whats im thinkin, what would you trade gerald for? another SF? im satisfied with our bigs for now, we dont need a starter, just a solid role player who can score some. why trade wallace, who is a solid 3, for another 3? and PG is fine with felton and DJ. a SG? if you do that, where does carrol and morrison and brown play? the 3? haha

keep wallace, he is still improving his game. he really has gotten better at Free throws and his "set" jump shot. id trade felton if a deal came along for a starting quality sg.

LB doesnt like Crash IMO, so I think Felton and him are on borrowed time in Charlotte. If they trade with Portland and get Frye, they can play Diaw at SF, Frye at PF, Oak at C, webster at SG and DJ at PG. They could also start Ammo in a Crash trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...