Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star,Luke or Hankins?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

I think this years first pick is pretty straight forward unless we win a couple more games.I would like either Star or Luke if it is up to me.The Oakland game may decide who gets Star with both teams needs help at DT. 2nd round has a few more options.It appears at wr we could only get a good number 2 so I am not really sure if that is logical. Barret Jones OG,OT,C would be a great pick if he is there or Elam if he should drop a few spots.Other than that it may be the best cb availible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what we do with Gross, and what we do with the Edwards'.

If we decide to cut Gross, the pick will be Joeckel.

If we keep Gross, and either Dwan leaves in free agency, or Ron is cut due to age/injury, we will take either star or Hankins depending on that situation.

If Dwan leaves, we need Star. If Ron leaves, we need Hankins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what we do with Gross, and what we do with the Edwards'.

If we decide to cut Gross, the pick will be Joeckel.

If we keep Gross, and either Dwan leaves in free agency, or Ron is cut due to age/injury, we will take either star or Hankins depending on that situation.

If Dwan leaves, we need Star. If Ron leaves, we need Hankins.

I think Dwan is under contract for another season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would take Luke hands down.

You have your young franchise QB....now slide in your stud LT to protect him for the next decade.

You saw how effective Cam is when he gets some time in the pocket.

Luke at LT....Amini at LG (kid is getting better and better)....Kalil in the middle....? at RG....Gross (after he restructures) at RT.

Damn fine OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would take Luke hands down.

You have your young franchise QB....now slide in your stud LT to protect him for the next decade.

You saw how effective Cam is when he gets some time in the pocket.

Luke at LT....Amini at LG (kid is getting better and better)....Kalil in the middle....? at RG....Gross (after he restructures) at RT.

Damn fine OL.

I rather have a Vet who has experience blocking for Cam than a rookie. Tell me how many rookie OL made immediate impact. We saw Amini struggle this year. I don't want another rookie OL having to go through a learning developing process blocking for Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...