Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yea its a BR Mock dammit!


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

If anyone wanna take a look at a BR MOCK, here it is:

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1512696-2013-nfl-mock-draft-predicting-all-7-rounds-after-the-super-bowl/page/15

1: Jarvis Jones OLB

2: Quinton Patton WR

4: Jordan Hill DT

5: Rick Wagner OT

6: Gerald Hodges OLB

7: Manase Foketi OT

I'll have to say, it ain't that bad. Actually is a pretty good mock IMO, and I can def live with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ, Hardy and Dwan each had great season last year. But we still haven't have that MONSTER that will force OCs to game plan for (PEPPERS). Just imagine Jones on this defense with three already very good rushers. Tough for offenses to handle.

Jarvis is Miller2.0 no doubt! I don't care if we're already packed at lbs, I'm not passing up on the next best pass rusher. And Beason isnt quite the same, Anderson is average, and TD is aging with three ACL tears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking BPA leads to getting FOOTBALL PLAYERS (Cam/Kuechly).

Taking needs lead to players to fill position(s).

BPA that also fills a need is how you build good football teams....

If BPA is a RB, LB, etc and it isn't a need....you are better off drafting someone with a comparable grade at a more important position for your team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The thing I hate about strength of schedule is that NFL teams change so much over a year and past success or failure doesn't really dictate future success or failure
    • Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
×
×
  • Create New...