Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason thread: re draft our first rounders from the last 10 years


CardiacCats

Recommended Posts

2003: Keep Jordan Gross

2004: Keep Gamble

2005: Aaron Rodgers over Thomas Davis

2006: Keep DeAngelo

2007: Keep Beason

2008: Ray Rice over Jonathan Stewart

Duane Brown over Jeff Otah

2009: no 1st round pick

2010: no 1st round pick

2011: Keep Newton

2012: Keep Kuechly

Not a hard concept to grasp. It's just obviously you can only put a player to us that was picked after our original guy was picked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inb4 why the fug would you draft Cam if you have Rodgers? And if we had Rodgers it changes every draft position after that. What a stupid thread.

its just for that year. Obv we never took Rodgers, and if we did every draft after that is changed but it didn't happen so it has no effect on the other drafts. It doesn't work like that. You just look at it on a year to year basis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just for that year. Obv we never took Rodgers, and if we did every draft after that is changed but it didn't happen so it has no effect on the other drafts. It doesn't work like that. You just look at it on a year to year basis

That's stupid what you did in the draft before will effect the mind set of your pick regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A competent GM could have turned that Burns trade into 4 or 5 day 1 picks and still ended up with BY. Fitts was just so fugging bad. 
    • Well, as far as backups go, Kyle Allen is actually a decent one.  Better at this point than Dalton probably. That being said, Hooker apparently had an atrocious game against the Texans.  
    • i wouldn't say that yet. I also wouldn't say he's done anything that makes me think he's particularly good. i think that's about right for compensation both ways for thielen considering the state of the vikings and Panthers.  The weirdest thing is that technically the panthers should be adding veteran salary cap right now; they have a high cost first overall qb on a rookie contract; that's the best advantage in the NFL in this day and age. It hasn't worked out because, well, the qb they drafted isn't good and they've ignored other parts of the team to try to bolster him.  so what's morgan really supposed to do? Are they tanking with a rookie qb in year three that the owner probably personally wanted drafted? Are they actually trying to win games this year with 80 career catches between their top three receivers? The defense is probably going to be terrible. What kind of jump are people actually expecting from Coker, Bryce, XL, and performance from a rookie to overcome that? It's not realistic.  At the end of the day I don't think Thielen wanted to end his career here and I don't blame him. Minnesota is going to compete this year and Carolina isn't. I also think this is to toss Bryce to the wolves and be done with him one way or another. There's no way this works. This is not a move you make if you're trying to win football games. 
×
×
  • Create New...