Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Pioli and Mike Tannenbaum both do top 10 mock


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Both were GM"s in the league early last month so they must know a little something.

Things that were interesting both had the first 3 picks going

1.Cheifs-Joeckel

2.Jags- Dee Milliner

3.Raiders- Floyd

There may have been a couple others(don't have time to go back and watch videos) that were the same but one that stood out was they both had Cordaralle Patterson at 9 to the Jets.

Here's Pioli's

http://www.nfl.com/v...li-s-mock-draft

Here's Tannenbaums

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-combine/0ap2000000143397/What-would-Tannenbaum-do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One caveat, both said its impossible to do a mock right now without free agency having occurred.

Of course that goes without saying.

Things I found interesting was their top 3 being identical.

Then these 3 both were consensus top 10 picks for each guys.

Cordarelle Patterson

Warmack

Vaccaro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Star drops out of the top 10 I would hope we seriously consider moving up to get him, he would give us a DOMINATE front seven which would take the pressure off the back end.

not that I would agree with this but,

if he is that dominate of a player................. why wait until he falls past #10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...