Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Once Gamble is Cut, Cornerback Becomes Our Biggest Need


Gallagher

Recommended Posts

gamble is a player we can move away from and barely notice. he's not a difference maker. we're not any better or worse of because of him being on or off the field.

it's not any more of a need than it was before.

Agreed... People will always bring up the Chiefs game but they don't realize that that's the game after Big Ron went on IR so our DLine wasn't as strong (and Fua was the fuggin starting NT) and we started Nakamura throughout 7 games as soon as Martin/Campbell the safety play was better

CB isn't the top need (1. NT, 2.RG)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Smith's replacements < Chris Gamble's replacements

That is why I put WR ahead of CB. But I do feel that OL and DT are the most important right now, but I like how Gettleman says drafting for need gets you in trouble. The thing is we have a whole lot of needs, especially future needs that will develop once we cut guys to get under the cap. But protecting Cam, beefing up the DL and getting Cam some weapons are the most important right now.

Do you feel LaFell, Gettis, Murphy, Pilares and Adams is a quality WR line up gong into next year?

I dont, but I think at least Thomas, Dockery and Norman can be serviceable at worse going into next year while we address DT, OL and WR with our 1st 3 picks this year.

I feel way more comfortable with the WR corp then the CB corp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed... People will always bring up the Chiefs game but they don't realize that that's the game after Big Ron went on IR so our DLine wasn't as strong (and Fua was the fuggin starting NT) and we started Nakamura throughout 7 games as soon as Martin/Campbell the safety play was better

CB isn't the top need (1. NT, 2.RG)

The WR played better as the Play calling got better and the Oline jelled. But nobody talks about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if gamble is cut, we won't be releasing capt.

we won't be without the both of them without someone else with experience brought in.

We won't be releasing Captain because he is a UFA. You can't release a player not under contract.

We have to sign him for him to be on this team this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The WR played better as the Play calling got better and the Oline jelled. But nobody talks about that.

Umm.. I didn't mention it because we're talking about defense here. But I do think we need a RG (we'll be better once Kalil returns). As for the WR I think it's because we started utilizing more of the WR's that were on the bench

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im sorry but all the rookie DB's that we were playing the latter half of the season played well enough for me to let them play one more year. They werent seattle, but they held their own for what was expected of them last april [which was essentially nothing]. Again, i would love for us to go after Miliner if we could or the honeybadger in the 4th, but i wouldnt be so concerned if we didnt. What would help the secondary without having to draft an actual DB would be good interior pass rushers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im sorry but all the rookie DB's that we were playing the latter half of the season played well enough for me to let them play one more year. They werent seattle, but they held their own for what was expected of them last april [which was essentially nothing]. Again, i would love for us to go after Miliner if we could or the honeybadger in the 4th, but i wouldnt be so concerned if we didnt. What would help the secondary without having to draft an actual DB would be good interior pass rushers.

I agree the only Secondary I want in the draft is a safety. We need to get a vet FA DB. I was just saying this is a bigger problem then WR. Special if we lose Gamble and Capt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gamble is a very good cover 2 corner who often freelanced his way to interceptions but was never that great in man coverage. We appear to be going to more of a man coverage scheme with press coverage on the edges. That does not appear to be Gamble's best skill set anymore. Moving on might makes good money sense but also might better fit what we are doing going forward.

Anyone have info which breaks down how he did in zone versus man situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand this mentality. Yeah, the rules on pass interference are stacked in the offense's favor, but an elite CB like Darell Revis or Richard Sherman can shut down #1 receivers.

But we can not afford elite talent at any position.To me our weakest position is safety with martin gone or with Martin staying.An elite cb is 10 million a year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...