Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty 2.0

CarolinaCatBrigade

Recommended Posts

CarolinaCatBrigade Newbie

CarolinaCatBrigade

Posted
Posted

Stop with this Smitty 2.0 nonsense, I've heard it for years. David Gettis, Armanti Edwards, some scrub in the 6th round from a D2 school. Every year someone compares a WR with no relevance to Smith, every WR thread is smitty 2.0 (or just feels like it....). There will NEVER be another Steve Smith, so stop with this impossible fantasy and wake up to the real world, we got Smith for only a short time longer, enjoy his magic while it's still here. There is and always will be 1 Steve Smith.

The End.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

I was just trolling your thread, bro. I agree with you. There won't be another Smitty. However, I think what people are getting at are those guys "under the radar" that have breakaway speed and the potential to be a steal like Smitty was. We do need a Smitty-esque guy in here that can catch the deep ball whenever Smith retires, so that's what they're trying to say. I don't think Gettis is that guy, but he'll be a DAMN fine #2 or #3 if he gets his shot, IMO. Lafell, Gettis....now we need that #1 to be the heir apparent to Smith that won't mind being a rotational slot guy in the meantime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCatBrigade Newbie

CarolinaCatBrigade

Posted
  • Author
Posted

like, quit be so annoying. Kapeesh?

Why get so butt hurt over me stating a fact? There will never be another Steve Smith, just like there will never be another Barry Sanders or Joe Montana. People can compare and contrast all they want to, but if someone is to be compared to Smith, I want it to be on the basis of his overall character, not just a small guy who runs fast. If you are psyched about a speedy slot receiver or a future Smith replacement (which I hope we find that guy ASAP) then thats great I am too, but to say Smith 2.0 is giving too much credit to someone who hasn't earned it yet, and that sir isn't worth crying about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaAllDay Newbie

CarolinaAllDay

Posted
Posted

No? No what? If you have something to say make it worth while. There is only one Steve Smith, and I'm tired of him being compared to random D2 scrubs just because they are small or run fast

>calls someone a random d2 scrub

>probably cant even play madden, none the less a real football game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CarolinaLivin
      Answers to the QB equation

      By CarolinaLivin · Posted

      I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • frankw
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By frankw · Posted

      I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...