Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Orton named starting quarterback


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

i think orton was decent last year..so maybe this system will help him in denver

"There's a lot of difficult aspects about what we ask our quarterback to do in our offense and Kyle has really grasped some of them more quickly than Chris did," McDaniels said in explaining the move after the second day of a three-day minicamp at the team's Dove Valley headquarters

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4256553

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orton is a good QB. He benefited a lot last year from a solid run game and hopefully he will this year with a much better oline and (arguably) a more talented RB.

Plus, I think his beard gives him magical powers, that or your spleen is required to be a successful QB in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bears revamped an O-line that did alot better last season than most think, I think it's too early to say Denvers will be "much" better and it's also a little premature to say that Moreno is on Forte's level either.Like Forte, he was good in college but some backs just don't adjust to the NFL well and Forte is already seen as one of the premier backs in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...