Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lame Duck Situation....


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

Honestly Rivera showed some promise after Hurney was fired and the Players knew they had to play. Give Rivera the right players I think he can be successful, how much success I'm not sure.

Rivera and Cam have pretty much been a play away in every game they have ever been in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other words, you're speculating, but you agree that he won't be back if he doesn't win. But there's no way he's a lame duck because he has a contract, so he's pretty much guaranteed two years? Is that your position? I think you really wrote that in a hurry, so I don't want to read anything into it.

I guess it gets down to what you think lame duck means, versus what everyone else thinks it means. At any rate, we all agree that he wins next year or he's done. Call that what you will. :)

*edit* Actually, help me out here. How would YOU define lame duck status? And what would you expect from Management regarding player signings and assistant contracts in a lame duck situation? Let's get on the same page.

I said he is the coach until further notice. I said that doesn't make him any more of a lame duck than half the coaches in the league under similar pressure. Does he have to win? Who doesn't??? How many will it take? 7 or 9 or 10? I don't really know. Really isn't that much ambiguity about lame duck and what it means. Here is the dictionary definition: http://www.bing.com/Dictionary/search?q=define+lame+duck&qpvt=lame+duck+definition&FORM=DTPDIA Here is another: http://dictionary.babylon.com/lame%20duck/ Seems to me the definition is consistent and has nothing to do with an NFL coach who is on the hot seat. I guess if you want to make up a definition to suit your needs you can but that hardly gets us on the same page. It simply allows people to make their own definitions to suit their needs at the time. As for what would a team do in a true lame duck situation? They would proceed with what they wanted to do irrespective of the coach and in line with the next hire who is in the wings waiting for his term to begin. Since Rivera hired the people he wanted and still in helping with player acquisitions and building the team he wants, again nothing speaks to a lame duck situation. Why not admit the term doesn't fit instead of trying to do verbal gymnastics to make it fit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
    • I like Morgan's approach but I'll wait for a few winning seasons before giving too much praise.
×
×
  • Create New...