Should we draft two WRs in the first two rounds?

[CharlottePanther]

For awhile I have been hearing how we should draft a WR and defense in the first two rounds, and up until today I also thought that, but after thinking about it longer, why not just draft two WRs in the first two rounds? I know the initial thought seems absurd at first but really think about it..

This draft class is extremely deep and strong (I know, que the Thas What She Said comments) at WR, I could see Keenan Allen, Patterson and Hopkins, atleast one or two of them in the 2nd round being avaliable. Just imagine how beastly it would be if we drafted Tavon Austin in the first and say a Keenan Allen or Hopkins in the 2nd round. You have to admit, the thought of that gets you excited.

Just think, Smitty has two years tops left in his career. In two years we could have Tavon Austin/Hopkins as our number 1/number 2 and Lafell as our number 3. You have to admit, that is one hell of a WR corps.

Also think about this, is there any DT that will be avaliable in the 2nd round that will be potential game changers? I personally dont think so. And the talent drop off is pretty huge with O lineman as well. The bottom line is, we have worked out a ton of WRs, could it be possible that Gman is looking to double dip and solidify our WR corps for the next decade?

This is the deepest WR draft class in quite some time and wouldnt be mad whatsoever if this happened.

[CPF4LIFE]

I wouldnt have a problem with it, the only receiver we will have under contract after this year is Smitty if im not mistaken which is pretty crazy in itself. So they could be looking at a complete overhaul, who knows.

[carolina-chuck]

I would wish but why when we can only go with maybe a max of 7 receivers into the season. I'd rather we go two DTs, corners or Safety in the first two rounds. Not happening especially with the few picks we have.

[Ivan The Awesome]

You know. I made a comment about this but it was all in good fun. If we take a WR in both the 1st and 2nd Adams, Pilares, and any WR we picked in the past 3 years would become a waste.

[CAPantherFan]

Hell no. Need talent at DB and DT position not to mention OL. Don't put all your eggs in one basket...

[carolina-chuck]

Wouldn't it be fun to see Cam on the field with 89, Keenan and Hunter?

[koolkatluke]

For awhile I have been hearing how we should draft a WR and defense in the first two rounds, and up until today I also thought that, but after thinking about it longer, why not just draft two WRs in the first two rounds? I know the initial thought seems absurd at first but really think about it..

This draft class is extremely deep and strong (I know, que the Thas What She Said comments) at WR, I could see Keenan Allen, Patterson and Hopkins, atleast one or two of them in the 2nd round being avaliable. Just imagine how beastly it would be if we drafted Tavon Austin in the first and say a Keenan Allen or Hopkins in the 2nd round. You have to admit, the thought of that gets you excited.

Just think, Smitty has two years tops left in his career. In two years we could have Tavon Austin/Hopkins as our number 1/number 2 and Lafell as our number 3. You have to admit, that is one hell of a WR corps.

Also think about this, is there any DT that will be avaliable in the 2nd round that will be potential game changers? I personally dont think so. And the talent drop off is pretty huge with O lineman as well. The bottom line is, we have worked out a ton of WRs, could it be possible that Gman is looking to double dip and solidify our WR corps for the next decade?

This is the deepest WR draft class in quite some time and wouldnt be mad whatsoever if this happened.

Not dogging you opinion but I would be fuging furious if we did that stupid poo. Do you people think we can add 4 Wr and score 80 points a game or something? It doesn't work that way.

Examples:

2012 Saints - Great fuging offense no defense 7-9 record.

2011 Panthers - 5th ranked scoring offenses bad defense 6-10 record.

[carolina-chuck]

You know. I made a comment about this but it was all in good fun. If we take a WR in both the 1st and 2nd Adams, Pilares, and any WR we picked in the past 3 years would become a waste.

I love Adams, but $hit I would cut him loose with AE, Gettis and Pilares and go with a corp of 89, LaFail, Hixon, Ginn (ST?), Keenan, and Hunter.,

[koolkatluke]

Wouldn't it be fun to see Cam on the field with 89, Keenan and Hunter?

no because if they don't score every time they have the ball. We have to watch Fua and a horrible secondary get crushed.

[rayzor]

no. that would be stupid.

now a WR and a TE in the first couple rounds?

GENIUS!!!!!!!

[TheRed]

No, we only have five picks. I still say the position must be addressed in one of the first two rounds though.

[carolina-chuck]

Pipe dreams. It would be fun but no way that happens

I said it wasn't happening

[carolina-chuck]

no because if they don't score every time they have the ball. We have to watch Fua and a horrible secondary get crushed.

Damn only if we didn't have Fua

[carolina-chuck]

no because if they don't score every time they have the ball. We have to watch Fua and a horrible secondary get crushed.

I'm just trying to put some life into this thread, but what if we change Sione Fua to Sione Pouha, Keenan/Hunter (1/2), and get a guy like Shamarko Thomas in the 4th? We have to agree that on paper, we have a already better defense than last year with an improved secondary. If we can add Pouha and Thomas, the defense dramatically improve. Maybe, we could go two receivers after all.