Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1: Gerald Henderson, SG, Duke


King Taharqa

Recommended Posts

Even the most hardcore Duke fans will admit that he was going at his face trying to bust it up. Your either high or just flat retarded to think it was an accident.

You're a moron. Even Tyler doesn't think it was intentional. He swatted and closed his eye's. It was a accident. This is 2009 and the NBA not 2007 and college. It's time to let that poo go. This is a great pick. You can't teach defense, but you can teach someone how to shoot better. I'm really excited to see him play. To the analysis on Gerald by King, he led Duke in scoring last year, so I'm not sure what you mean by he never could be the guy at Duke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the pick overall, he definitely was what we were looking for as far as his abilities he bring to the table. I actually thought he was the better pick between himself and T. Will simply because T. Will as a Senior (thats the critical part) still hadnt' really developed even a mediocre offensive game. Henderson can pull off the defensive work and has much more potential to be a solid scorer.

Also, all the Carolina Fans (who most likely didn't go to Carolina) whining about this pick are ra-tards. This is the NBA, who gives a flying poo where a guy played before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...