Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Williams #2 TE?


Zod

Recommended Posts

So I see there is a lot of interest in Brandon Williams. From what I have witnessed, I think his stock is rising. He has shown really good hands and has caught most things that has come his way. But as a #2 TE the question also is how is his blocking skills.

 

So here are a couple of pics and how he did today 1 on 1 versus two quality linebackers.

 

First up, Senn.

 

bandon-williams-panthers-1-1.jpg

 

Senn didn't have much progress as all versus Williams. Once Brandon got his mits on Senn's numbers, it was over. There was no way Senn was going to power over him. Advantage - Williams.

 

Next was Jason Williams

bandon-williams-panthers-1.jpg

 

Jason tried a spin move, and again was shut down by Brandon. Brandon stuck with Jason the entire way, keeping him out of range of the QB.

bandon-williams-panthers-12-2.jpg

 

So considering this guy has been completely out of football for a while, only playing basketball, I think what he has shown on the field to be pretty remarkable. He is at the very least holding his own against legit NFL defensive players. Imagine a year from now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news. We need another talented TE to pair with Olsen, and no I'm not talking about Hartsock.

Am I the only one blown away by his physical presence?

No you are not. I want to see him stiff arming scrubs to the turf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dat block

drawn__dat_face_by_xelvanox-d4gtfh2.png

 

 

But in all seriousness, I really hope this guy succeeds. Of all the camp guys the huddle has loved over measurables/potential (the Lamont Bryants, the Bruce Campbells, etc.) I think Williams has the best chance to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great story, and he appears to have an excellent work ethic, and appreciation of education. 

 

Every one marvels at his body, strength and athletic ability. 

 

I hope he makes the team, stays health and is a contributor. 

 

He should only get better, as he gets more experience, in shape, and the system piece down. 

 

Good Luck Brandon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one blown away by his physical presence? Dude is one of the most ripped and massive football players I have seen. If this is Williams rusty and just getting back into football, we best keep him on board and let him reach that ceiling of his. Dude could be great if he stays healthy. Match-up nightmare.

 

Of course, not. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one blown away by his physical presence? Dude is one of the most ripped and massive football players I have seen. If this is Williams rusty and just getting back into football, we best keep him on board and let him reach that ceiling of his. Dude could be great if he stays healthy. Match-up nightmare.

 

Of course, not. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...