Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Release Depth Chart

CarolinaPanthers8789

Recommended Posts

CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Link: http://www.panthers.com/team/depth-chart.html

Overall, the chart looks fairly accurate to how the guys have lined up in camp.

Here's a few notes and errors...

- Brockel is still listed as a tight end instead of a full back. I believe he has been splitting reps with Zordich at the full back position.

- Brandon Williams is the 4th string tight end when it seems as if he has made the jump to 2nd string tight end in training camp.

- Hixon is listed as the 4th receiver when it appears Ginn has been lining up as the 4th receiver and Hixon has been lining up as the 5th receiver in camp.

- Gettis is listed as the 5th receiver while Hixon has been lining up as the 5th receiver in practice. Gettis has been battling Pilares, Bersin, and Adams for the 6th wide receiver position.

- Joe Adams is listed as the 2nd string punt returner, but he is not listed among the top eight wide receivers.

- Tauren Poole, Dominique Curry, Talib Ikharo, Zack Pianalto, Dale Moss, and James Shaw were not listed on the depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rules&Regulations Newbie

Rules&Regulations

Posted
Posted

Joe Adams not even listed on WR depth chart...looks like he and Pilates are done.

Looks like AE won the #3 WR spot so the coaches must have been very impressed with him.

A little surprised to see Brandon Williams so buried on the TE chart; with the reports of how good he looked in camp I thought he'd be #3 pushing for that 2 spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...