Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

King & Rosario


Cat Fanboy

Recommended Posts

I remember everyone talking about Rosario's athelicism (s?) last year and comparisons to Gates/Gonzo, and watched him make some great catches -

but it's King who always seemed to be clutch on that long 3rd down when the ball wasn't chucked to Smith.

Maybe our TE's are spending most of the time blocking for the Train that's coming but it would be great to see just a few more passes to both these guys.

We may never have Walls back but both can be used more effectively imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said in another thread, as long as Jake is our QB the TE position will never be a weapon for us. I would like to see more passes to the TE's as well but what can you do when your QB only see's #89?

Hmmm... come now now.

These 2 got less action than in '07, because we didn't have nearly the same running game, AND we had like 7 millions QB's in '07 as well. They weren't all on the same page with Smitty either.

(07)Jeff King - 46 catches, 2 TD

(08)Jeff King - 21 catches, 1 TD

(07)Dante Rosario - 6 catches, 2 TD

(08)Dante Rosario - 18 catches, 1 TD

13 less balls to those to alone.

Our Running game is our "bread and butter". If they coach thinks the run is gonna get it done, then so be it. the TE's will block. That's always what Fox has wanted to do, because he's a run oriented guy.

If we passed more I think we'd see more to the TE's. Jake liked it when more TE passing plays were put in... but then the line stepped up and the running game came back. and TADA... Back to blocking.

At least that's what I've seen.

I'd like to see them more involved too. But, as a philosophy, I don't think it's big in Fox/Davidson scheme of things. But when they are called. the mostly work. That's what matters.

and to the OP...

but it's King who always seemed to be clutch on that long 3rd down when the ball wasn't chucked to Smith

I think Dwayne Jarrett was more clutch with his 3rd down plays to be honest.

I dunno, I'm tired. but that's what I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to popular belief, Delhomme does not "lock in" on Smith. Any quarterback with a receiver of Smith's calibre would be crazy not to target him as much as possible. More often than not, Smith is going to come away with the catch.

I remember in one of the game's last year (struggling to remember which), Stewart was wide open with no one remotely close to him. I was amazed that with all that time to throw, he didn't chuck it up to the wide-open running back.

Then he chucked up something like a 40-yard pass to Smith in the endzone. :)

Like Alverez has pointed out, the tight-ends in this offense must be good blockers for our backs first and foremost. It would be nice to see Rosario and Barnidge making some nice receptions out there, but I don't think we necessarily need to improve upon it as long as No. 34 and 28 are running the ball effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's been comparisons done and Jake spreads it just as much as any QB in the NFL.

We've got a good stable with King, Rosario and Barnidge and with our QB coach and Davidson this stable ought to get used more frequently. We won 12 games without using these guys as centre points in the offense and we certainly didn't lose any games because of a lack of production from the tight end position.

So why bother altering it too much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember in one of the game's last year (struggling to remember which), Stewart was wide open with no one remotely close to him. I was amazed that with all that time to throw, he didn't chuck it up to the wide-open running back.

Then he chucked up something like a 40-yard pass to Smith in the endzone. :)

Second TB game. It was just on again on NFLN recently. Good stuff, Alv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember everyone talking about Rosario's athelicism (s?) last year and comparisons to Gates/Gonzo, and watched him make some great catches -

but it's King who always seemed to be clutch on that long 3rd down when the ball wasn't chucked to Smith.

Maybe our TE's are spending most of the time blocking for the Train that's coming but it would be great to see just a few more passes to both these guys.

We may never have Walls back but both can be used more effectively imo.

King was not a third down option very much. He ony had 2 third down catches for a total of 6 yards in 2008. He had no catches when it was third and more than 8 yards.

Even last year with "dump it short" Carr, he only had 8 catches when it was 3rd and 8 or longer. Of those he converted 4 of them.

Just sayin.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking for more use of TE's in the passing game. The coaches did not pick up Gary Barnidge for his blocking ability but for his ability to stretch the field seems to me.

if that was the case he would have been starting last season..lol i think barnidge will start but his blocking will have to get a lot better..IMO if we are going to do a lot more passing to the TE i would rather have rasairo and barnidge both can be playmakers in the passing game..but i know king will stick around because of his blocking skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only person who isn't really bothered that our TE's don't catch many balls? We're a run-first offense; we will live and die by our running game. Our TE's are there to be good blockers.

I'm all for that, but a good passing game opens up the running game and keeps opposing defenses honest. Even a decent passing game will mean less 8-9 players in the box, making our running game more potent (not to mention less double-triple coverage on Smith). I don't want a West Coast offense by any stretch, but a balanced offense is the way to go IMO. The Steelers - a team that we are trying to emulate - used the TE very effectively during the postseason and it help them win a SB. Is there a lesson there for the Panthers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only person who isn't really bothered that our TE's don't catch many balls? We're a run-first offense; we will live and die by our running game. Our TE's are there to be good blockers.

It bothers me we can't find a guy who can block and catch balls as well. If Moose and Smitty can block very well and still catch balls like they do, there is no reason we can't find a couple of TEs who can block and catch balls also. In the end I would rather have a guy who blocked decently but caught all kinds of balls and stretched the field than I would have a guy block well and only catch a handful of passes.

The more weapons we have on offense, the harder we are to defend. Right now the slowest linebacker can cover King and Rosario. I would like to have a TE who routinely burned LBs so they would occupy a safety which would reduce some double coverage on Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It bothers me we can't find a guy who can block and catch balls as well. If Moose and Smitty can block very well and still catch balls like they do, there is no reason we can't find a couple of TEs who can block and catch balls also. In the end I would rather have a guy who blocked decently but caught all kinds of balls and stretched the field than I would have a guy block well and only catch a handful of passes.

The more weapons we have on offense, the harder we are to defend. Right now the slowest linebacker can cover King and Rosario. I would like to have a TE who routinely burned LBs so they would occupy a safety which would reduce some double coverage on Smith.

Really? Rosario appeared to have pretty good speed when we first drafted him and the handful of times we threw to him last season.

Agree with you on King, and I'm hoping Kevin Brock will finally make him expendable next season. His blocking aside, he gives us very little offensively albeit a few 3rd down catches and no YAC. Not hating on the guy, but I think we could use an upgrade there IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
    • Just to be clear: I'm not "downplaying" the talent around Bryce... I'm qualifying it. There's a big difference between saying, "we finally have building blocks that we're actually developing" and "we've done enough to say this is a finished product, NO EXCUSES!" It's possible to believe that the 2023 situation was bad and to believe that the current state, while improved, is still incomplete. That's not inconsistency; that's nuance. As for the footwork stuff, again, I've seen the same clips as others. The claim that Bryce is hopping to see over the line just isn't one I've seen corroborated by analysts or tape breakdown. "Both feet off of the ground to throw" happens a ton for QBs (ex: Mahomes, Rodgers, Purdy, etc.), especially when improvising. You're right that there were some encouraging flashes from Bryce last season, and it's nice to finally hear that after so much time was spent pretending otherwise. I'm not arguing that Bryce is elite, I'm just asking that we evaluate him using consistent, measurable criteria to determine his status as a top-10 QB... whether it's via 3rd down %, red zone efficiency, turnover-worthy plays, or yes, big-time throws (which, by the way, has been a valid part of QB evaluation across the league for years even if it wasn't used here during Kyle Allen or Teddy Bridgewater's years. For reference: Allen had 20 BTT at a 3.9% rate. Teddy had 17 BTT at 3.3%). Like you, I'm hoping to see a competent, entertaining offense this season. That's a baseline we can all root for, even if we don't have the same baseline for what makes a QB top-10 (which, to be fair, is what this conversation has been about... though I respect the attempt to reframe it).
    • I am optimistic that we might be on the verge of fielding a sustainable offense finally. The Bryce stats listed above are definitely encouraging. I don’t want to overly inflate this and disregard the previous 1 and a half seasons of production from Bryce and “cherry pick” stats but do hope the benching turns into an inflection point in his trajectory.      Lots of excitement heading into this season. 
×
×
  • Create New...