Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Someone's not gonna be happy


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I'm OK with picking up the 5th year option (mostly because there aren't any clear long-term better options likely to be available in the offseason) but I need to see a lot more consistency before I'd support a full-on contract extension.

Its year 3. I don’t think he will ever be consistent 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Do you want actual or potential options?

He doesn’t want either. He’s using a rhetorical device called a thought terminating cliche. An example of this would be any time someone says something like “well it doesn’t matter no one will do <thing being argued about>.”

he’s not actually interested in debate about this; he wants to nitpick specifics from a list of options that are unknown as you pointed out. Then he’ll just burden of proof you to death. The person most famous for this kind of arguing ended up exsanguinated from a hole in his neck, cucked before his body got cold.

the correct answer of course to “who specifically,” based on the past three years, is basically anyone that steps on the field.

Why speculate about who specifically the player is when we’ve seen it can be Phillip rivers, Russell Wilson, or Daniel jones.

Just get literally anyone. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Do you want actual or potential options? The CURRENT free agent list is available but that will likely change quite a bit based on what we are seeing happen already.

Who specifically would you bring in that would be better than Young. I do not need the complete list of FA's. Just tell me which available QB you would bring in that you think would upgrade the Panthers' offense next year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro&#x27;s horse said:

He doesn’t want either. He’s using a rhetorical device called a thought terminating cliche. An example of this would be any time someone says something like “well it doesn’t matter no one will do <thing being argued about>.”

he’s not actually interested in debate about this; he wants to nitpick specifics from a list of options that are unknown as you pointed out. Then he’ll just burden of proof you to death. The person most famous for this kind of arguing ended up exsanguinated from a hole in his neck, cucked before his body got cold.

the correct answer of course to “who specifically,” based on the past three years, is basically anyone that steps on the field.

Why speculate about who specifically the player is when we’ve seen it can be Phillip rivers, Russell Wilson, or Daniel jones.

Just get literally anyone. 

Oh I am aware. He is a Forever Brycer.

He was expecting I wouldn't even reply or give a wishy washy answer.

The truth is, there will be ample options at least as good as Bryce with far, far higher ceilings and a smaller group of CLEARLY better than Bryce options available, as well.

And that's not even touching the draft.

It's a far shorter list to find QB's in the NFL that are demonstrably WORSE than Bryce. Although I do have that list available, as well.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

Who specifically would you bring in that would be better than Young. I do not need the complete list of FA's. Just tell me which available QB you would bring in that you think would upgrade the Panthers' offense next year. 

So I get to pick, in god-like fashion whomever I want with no limits????

I am attempting to give realistic or potential options but if you just want me to start listing better QB's than Bryce, I can do that too.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like cranky just in case you’re sincere and this isn’t just some bit (laudatory if so) what you’re doing is borderline sea lioning and that’s a bad look.

if you’re unfamiliar with that term you’re basically forcing a conversation, getting defensive about being belittled, and never bringing anything worth debating to the table.

you’ve posted an opinion piece from someone who starts it off by admitting how wrong he’s been about this.

you need the light of islam Bro. Log off and recite the shahada. 

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

So I get to pick, in god-like fashion whomever I want with no limits????

I am attempting to give realistic or potential options but if you just want me to start listing better QB's than Bryce, I can do that too.

It's a serious question regardless of electro's nonsense post. The limit is they have to be available net season. So they need to be a free agent or someone from the draft. Or, if there is a BU QB the Panther's could legitimately trade for. SO it needs to be realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

It's a serious question regardless of electro's nonsense post. The limit is they have to be available net season. So they need to be a free agent or someone from the draft. Or, if there is a BU QB the Panther's could legitimately trade for. SO it needs to be realistic.

Placing made up restrictions on speculation about replacing a midget we made the worst trade in thirty years for. Powerful. 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...