Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our OL reviewed


CRA

Recommended Posts

Last year, our RBs looked average....that was b/c of weak OL play. Why was our O inconstant last year? Not Cam...OL play.

Did we go out and address this foundational flaw? No. A name change at RG but we essentially are the same.

Does the problem look the same? Let see...

Through 2 preason games....stud RB Williams is averaging a whooping 2.8 yards per carry. Blown up in the backfield each week. Our stud DL isn't blowing up RBs in the backfield with the same type consistancy as we are receiving. Just further evidence of how outmatched our OL is...and we haven't even been practicing against great DLs.

No point bitching about Cam, RBs not earning their checks, Rivera or Shula this year. Either DG is going to give us an OL to compete or he isn't. We don't need pro bowlers to improve....we have the cash and the bodies will be there at cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going into this season I think most fans agree that the O-line and secondary are lacking in talent. The O-line's run blocking needs to be more consistent, and we can't afford to lose yards on run plays. We need to vary the snap count more to keep opposing D-lines from firing off so well.

 

It doesn't help matters that we have two rookie DTs in our D-line rotation.

 

Cam needs a good running game to take some of the pressure off. I would think some better run blocking O-linemen will be available after the second round of cuts.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, our RBs looked average....that was b/c of weak OL play. Why was our O inconstant last year? Not Cam...OL play.

Did we go out and address this foundational flaw? No. A name change at RG but we essentially are the same.

Does the problem look the same? Let see...

Through 2 preason games....stud RB Williams is averaging a whooping 2.8 yards per carry. Blown up in the backfield each week. Our stud DL isn't blowing up RBs in the backfield with the same type consistancy as we are receiving. Just further evidence of how outmatched our OL is...and we haven't even been practicing against great DLs.

No point bitching about Cam, RBs not earning their checks, Rivera or Shula this year. Either DG is going to give us an OL to compete or he isn't. We don't need pro bowlers to improve....we have the cash and the bodies will be there at cuts.

 

They practice against a stellar D-Line every day and even though it was a make shift O-line we still where # 9 in rushing. I am betting my money that by week 1 that Kugbila & William will solve our RG problem. 

 

The only real concern I think we have is depth at RT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where exactly are all these instant upgrades that are going to work for a hometown discount or vet minimum?  Sure we can pull names out of a hat like Wharton but I don't think he is an instant upgrade.  We got rid of him once already and it wasn't just cap room, he wasn't that good in the pass game.

Look at Brandon Moore who everyone on here was clamoring for.  He didn't get a deal and retired.  There are other teams out there with a bigger need for O line help than ours.  Why are they not signing Wharton or Moore or half a dozen names everyone pulls out of the air as the magic fix. Gettleman is a scout by trade and he isn't excited about who is out there so he isn't pulling the string on a bunch of long in the tooth vets.

 

He will pick up a guy or two after final cuts.  I am just not convinced they will be better than what we already have.  Our starters now are likely our starters in the regular season..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where exactly are all these instant upgrades that are going to work for a hometown discount or vet minimum? Sure we can pull names out of a hat like Wharton but I don't think he is an instant upgrade. We got rid of him once already and it wasn't just cap room, he wasn't that good in the pass game.

Look at Brandon Moore who everyone on here was clamoring for. He didn't get a deal and retired. There are other teams out there with a bigger need for O line help than ours. Why are they not signing Wharton or Moore or half a dozen names everyone pulls out of the air as the magic fix. Gettleman is a scout by trade and he isn't excited about who is out there so he isn't pulling the string on a bunch of long in the tooth vets.

He will pick up a guy or two after final cuts. I am just not convinced they will be better than what we already have. Our starters now are likely our starters in the regular season..

Wharton is better than Williams all day everyday and twice on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They practice against a stellar D-Line every day and even though it was a make shift O-line we still where # 9 in rushing. I am betting my money that by week 1 that Kugbila & William will solve our RG problem. 

 

The only real concern I think we have is depth at RT

Cam skews are rushing numbers...which is why we were 9th. He was our leading rusher. He makes it look on paper much better

I am talking about the traditional rush attack and what the RBs can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wharton is better than Williams all day everyday and twice on Sunday.

If you look at talent, potential, cost and all factors, Williams is the better choice if you are looking at this year and the future.  Williams has the potential to start and play well. He just needs game experience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where exactly are all these instant upgrades that are going to work for a hometown discount or vet minimum?  Sure we can pull names out of a hat like Wharton but I don't think he is an instant upgrade.  We got rid of him once already and it wasn't just cap room, he wasn't that good in the pass game.

Look at Brandon Moore who everyone on here was clamoring for.  He didn't get a deal and retired.  There are other teams out there with a bigger need for O line help than ours.  Why are they not signing Wharton or Moore or half a dozen names everyone pulls out of the air as the magic fix. Gettleman is a scout by trade and he isn't excited about who is out there so he isn't pulling the string on a bunch of long in the tooth vets.

 

He will pick up a guy or two after final cuts.  I am just not convinced they will be better than what we already have.  Our starters now are likely our starters in the regular season..

Where are the upgrades? I said in my post they will be there when cuts start....

It doesn't take much to improve out G and RT play. You don't have to sign a pro bowler to get a noticeable upgrade.

Wharton isn't that good anymore.....sadly, he likely is an instant upgrade for the season.

Gettlemen is a scout by trade....that doesn't mean he is going to do whatever it takes to win in what is essentially a playoff or rebuild year.....for Marty Hurney's coach.

Also, Gettlemen has some absurd he is new thus awesome hype. At this stage he is largely an unknown...brought in, told he would do x this year and made some painfully obvious calls. I hope he turns out to be legit. Him not signing OL talent doesn't mean there aren't instant upgrades....his job is more complex than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at talent, potential, cost and all factors, Williams is the better choice if you looking at this year and the future. Williams has the potential to start and play well. He just needs game experience.

Basically if you look at everything except winning. Two undrafteds holding up the right side of the line. Center coming off of a injury D2 lg and an aging left tackle. Gettlemagic. But it's cool because we have two new DT, bandaid wrs, bandaid secondary, rookie rb with ball security issues, and another d2 guard that can't get on the field. I keep saying it Gettleman built this roster so he can give Ron a chance but at the same time completely rebuild it if it doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at talent, potential, cost and all factors, Williams is the better choice if you are looking at this year and the future. Williams has the potential to start and play well. He just needs game experience.

Gotta look bigger....gotta look that we have Newton, good RBs, etc. OL can hold the entire O back and limit whatever does....

Hoping several question marks pan out on your OL....so it actually functions is beyond risky. Not to mention the risk they put all your key players in. If there is one spot you can justify overspending and going beyond the call of duty it is the OL IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

keep saying it Gettleman built this roster so he can give Ron a chance but at the same time completely rebuild it if it doesn't work.

This.

Some want to spin that and claim it mean sabatoge....it doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are the upgrades? I said in my post they will be there when cuts start....

It doesn't take much to improve out G and RT play. You don't have to sign a pro bowler to get a noticeable upgrade.

Wharton isn't that good anymore.....sadly, he likely is an instant upgrade for the season.

Gettlemen is a scout by trade....that doesn't mean he is going to do whatever it takes to win in what is essentially a playoff or rebuild year.....for Marty Hurney's coach.

Also, Gettlemen has some absurd he is new thus awesome hype. At this stage he is largely an unknown...brought in, told he would do x this year and made some painfully obvious calls. I hope he turns out to be legit. Him not signing OL talent doesn't mean there aren't instant upgrades....his job is more complex than that.

Again where are these upgrades at final cuts.  Guys like Kirwin and Ryan say they aren't going to be instant starters which is what we need to be better than what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta look bigger....gotta look that we have Newton, good RBs, etc. OL can hold the entire O back and limit whatever does....

Hoping several question marks pan out on your OL....so it actually functions is beyond risky. Not to mention the risk they put all your key players in. If there is one spot you can justify overspending and going beyond the call of duty it is the OL IMO

Gettleman already told you that he was making moves not just for this year but the next few years.  We need to win more games but in a smart controlled fashion.  You got look bigger which means for the future as well as the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...